PT106.S2.Q15

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 3 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5

PASSAGE 2

Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13

PASSAGE 3

Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

Mismatched premises. The stimulus outlines a conditional chain of A→B→C then negates the final necessary condition. (A) gives a sufficient condition (Janice coming to visit) and two necessary conditions (Mary not paying bills and Janice locating baby sitter). This does not parallel the conditional chain of A→B→C from the stimulus.

Mismatched premises. The stimulus outlines a conditional chain of A→B→C then negates the final necessary condition. (C) gives two sufficient conditions (/rain and fresh trout) for a necessary condition (barbecuing fish) then fails one of the sufficient conditions (/fresh trout).

Mismatched premises. The stimulus outlines a conditional chain of A→B→C; (D) gives a sufficient condition (Lisa attending) and a necessary condition (Jared OR Karl attends) and confirms one of the necessary conditions (Jared will attend).

Mismatched premises. The stimulus outlines a conditional chain of A→B→C; (E) gives also gives a conditional chain (George goes→Mark goes→ Mark can postpone most appointments). However, the stimulus then negates the final necessary condition, but (E) does not do this. (E) only says that Mark has postponed “some” appointments.