Self-study
A high-calorie diet providing adequate fats was a crucial requirement for the evolution of the anatomically modern human brain, a process that began among our early human ancestors. ████ █████████ ████ █████ ███████ ████ █ ████ ████ ████ ████████ ███ ████████ ██ ███ █████ ████████████ ████ ████ █████████ ██ █████ ███████ █████████████ ███ █████ ███████ █████████ ████ █████ ██████ ███████████ ██ ███████ ███ ████████ ██████
"Surprising" Phenomenon
Why did the human brain’s evolution take place almost entirely in the savnna and woodland rather than the shore, even though the food reources that could supply the high-calorie diet required for the brain’s development was more abundant in the shore?
Objective
The correct answer should help us differentiate the shore environment from the savanna and woodland in a way that could help explain why the brain’s development occurred in the savanna and woodland.
18.
Which one of the following, ██ █████ █████ ████ ████ ██ ███████ ███ ████████ ████████ █████████ ██████
a
Early humans had █ █████████████ █████ █████████ ████ ████ ████████████ ██████ ███████ ████████ ████ ██ ██████ █████ ███ ████████ ████ ████████████
This doesn’t differentiate the shore from the savanna and woodland. Even if early humans needed less fat, why did brain development occur in the savanna and woodland, which had less of the food resources required by the brain than did the shore? This doesn’t provide a theory.
b
The brains of ███ ████████ █████ ██████ ████ ██ ███████ ███████ ████ ███ ████████████ ██████ █████ ██████
This doesn’t differentiate the shore from the savanna and woodland. Even if early humans had smaller brains, why did brain development occur in the savanna and woodland, which had less of the food resources required by the brain than did the shore? This doesn’t provide a theory.
c
Prehistoric savanna and ████████ █████ ███████ ████ ████████ ███ ████████ █████████ ████ ████ ██ ██████
This compares savanna/woodland of the past to savanna/woodland of today. But it doesn’t compare the past savanna/woodland to the past shore environment. The stimulus still tells us that the past shore environment had more of the food resources than the past savanna/woodland.
d
The techniques used ██ ███████ ███ ███████████ ██ ███████████ █████ █████ ████ ████ ████████ ████ ██████████
This doesn’t suggest anything about the level of food resources available in the shore environment. Don’t assume that because the techniques were recently developed that we should doubt the facts given to us in the stimulus.
e
Gathering food in █████ ████████████ ████████ █ █████████████ ███████ ███████████ ██ ████████ ██ █████ ██████ ████ ███ █████████ ████ ██ █████ █████████████
If it cost more in calories to gather food in the shore than it did to gather food in the savanna/woodland, this extra cost could have outweighed the benefit of more food in the shore. It’s possible overall calorie intake could be higher in the savanna/woodland than in the shore.