PT137.S3.Q22 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19

PASSAGE 4

Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · lr

The author concludes that the government is responsible for the increase cost of gasoline.

Why?

Because the government’s policies have increased demand for fuel, and as a result of that increase demand, the price of gasoline has increased. (In other words, the government’s policies ultimately caused the price increase.)

Is the government “responsible” for the increased cost, just because it enacted policies that led to that increased cost? Not necessarily — “responsible” in this context means something like fault or blame. But we don’t know that whoever caused the increased price must be at fault/blamed for it.

The author must assume that if the government’s policies caused the increased price of gas, then the government is responsible for the increased price.

Necessary, because if it weren’t true — if the government CANNOT bear responsibility for that which it indirectly causes — then the conclusion would not follow from the premises. The premises establish that the government indirectly caused increased gas price. (It’s indirect because there was an intermediate cause — increased demand for fuel.) The author must assume that this indirect cause can result in the government bearing responsibility.

Not necessary, because we don’t know whether any of the consequences of the government’s policies were “unforeseen.” It might be that the government completely foresaw the increased gas price that would result from its policies.

Not necessary, because the argument concerns only a single instance in which consumer demand for fuel resulted in increased gas price. The argument concerns responsibility for that particular past phenomenon. But the author doesn’t have to assume anything universal about what consumer demand for gas always leads to.

Not necessary, because what the government is obligated to do (what it should or should not do) is a separate issue from what the government is responsible for.

Not necessary, because the argument concerns a situation in which government policies did result in increased demand for fuel. What would have happened if the policies did not increase demand for fuel is not something that affects the reasoning of the argument.

PrepTest 137 - Section 3 - Question 22

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action