Community Profile

This is my take (some people prefer to diagram this type of question, I will use a more descriptive approach):

I look at this question as a game of contrasts: all or none.

It’s almost like a LG question, make the inference.

We start from our players, some people are A and some people are B.

Ok, we have A and B.

Then we learn that no A can be crossed, on the other hand all B can be crossed. Now we know they are two separate groups and when it comes to crossing in love they don’t overlap.

Therefore, from the following sentence in the stimulus (aka inference number 1) we can say that Bs are not As.

Alright, I can see how this game goes, it’s our turn to make an additional inference from something new. Earlier they were talking about crossing in love, well now let’s talk about being intemperate (last sentence stimulus).

Knowing what we know, they give us a last piece of info: anyone who is not A is intemperate.

Who is not A? B. Then B must be intemperate, because they are two different groups. That “anyone” is pretty strong, who is not A? B, C, D, E… the rest of the world. B is one of them.

Answer choice E matches the prediction.

Discussions

Study Partner in Los Angeles?

Confirm action