Hi Kevin, You picked up on the keyword of the author's perspective (Myth). In a timed situation how would you be able to discern that from background context? Also wanted to ask how were able to come up with the example of cheese and given the point in the video where you stopped and made that analogy, hypothetically, had there been a change in the passage that made your example incompatible (per say) how would you respond to that? Thanks again for making these videos!
0
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
Hi Kevin, You picked up on the keyword of the author's perspective (Myth). In a timed situation how would you be able to discern that from background context? Also wanted to ask how were able to come up with the example of cheese and given the point in the video where you stopped and made that analogy, hypothetically, had there been a change in the passage that made your example incompatible (per say) how would you respond to that? Thanks again for making these videos!