Below is a link to Gladwell's podcast (part 1) where he talks about his experience taking the LSAT. There's still another part to come but the pod ends up being more about him contemplating/questioning the timing constraints placed on the LSAT in particular and law school testing in general. Figured some of you would find it interesting, enjoy.
Had a hard time with this one. Chose AC A under timed conditions because I didn't know what else to go with. Chose B when doing BR because I saw how this AC shielded the argument from being wrecked. If they are "unsexable" (Ha) then how are they suppose to reproduce and survive? Seems kinda petty of potential mates (do Rhino's actually do this?) but it is a NA which the argument requires.
So I was between AC B and E and chose E. I assumed B was a trap because of its use of "heart disease" same as the stimulus and they were trying to lure me in by using the same language. I know I need to understand the logic that JY explained in the video but I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts about the LSATs use of trap phrasing or language in the ACs? In @NotMyName's podcast i believe he had an off the cuff statement (I cant remember exactly what he said) about how he knew an AC wasnt correct because it used a certain phrasing or something. Anyways, just curious. #help
@ just wanted to let you know that PT14 G3 Q13 cuts off the third column in the answer choices. Thanks for all your help!
How does something not have an example when the word “example” is used in the stimulus? I miss questions all the time because I don’t understand when something is an example or counterexample so I could use some help on this issue in general, not just on this specific question. #help