I could not detect the conclusion in the stimulus, therefore initially chose answer choice (A).
After reviewing, I just want to confirm if the conclusion is the sentence that starts with "Increasing the number of electric cars on the road..."
Also,
How would you go about with diagramming answer choices (B) and (C)?
(B) M --> /reduce PS
(C) M --> /reduce PF
And is it correct that since there is no information given on what comes after M and reducing popularity, these two answer choices are not inferable.
I could not detect the conclusion in the stimulus, therefore initially chose answer choice (A).
After reviewing, I just want to confirm if the conclusion is the sentence that starts with "Increasing the number of electric cars on the road..."
Question:
But, isn't it true that being unpopular with faculty doesn't necessarily mean it will be popular with students?
I don't understand why the statement in the stimulus that says "bound to be unpopular with either faculty or students" makes a situation where it must be popular with the other group.
How is the middle ground not considered here?
Why doesn't (C) work?
Would (C) have worked if the question was a MSS or another type of question?
Is the sentence that starts with "As plausible as this may sound, at least one thing remains mysterious...," the conclusion of this stimulus?
So the main point would not be whatever comes after the sentence, which mainly talks about how there were no increases in temperature following earthquakes. Therefore, we can eliminate (A) and (D)...right?
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-4-question-02/
The conclusion in the stimulus, I believe, starts from "However, as a result of its attempt..."
Here, the taxpayer is saying that due to the fiscal irresponsibility of Metro City, they now have to spend a lot more money on reconstruction of its bridges.
However, I thought answer choice (A) is too strong and suggestive of an answer, therefore chose (D) after process of elimination.
Author clearly doesn't state that they 'should' have budgeted more money for maintenance of its bridges. So how is this a MP question? It seems like the stimulus contains premises and answer choice is the actual conclusion--more like a MSS question.
Can someone confirm that the last sentence is the conclusion, and also explain how answer choice A makes sense?
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-25-section-4-question-01/
I was told that I can still schedule for the LSAT-Flex while overseas, and I was actually able to on ProctorU.
I still don't understand why (B) doesn't work.