Hi,
I am confused that is "not" itself a 4th group reasoning indicator or has it to be paired up with both as "Not both" to be a 4th group indicator.
Thank you,
I appreciate your help
Isn't "except" a bi-conditional indicator? I am confused
OMG, I thought it asked for which option they disagreed with each other.....
damn, I misinterpret the stem and treat it as a necessary question.
Bro, I thought going to a daycare means the infants are less likely to be exposed to germs.......
Choice E is so tricky to notice smh
Choice A for real tricked me. I should've slowed my pace to read the stimulus carefully.
Hi,
I am confused that is "not" itself a 4th group reasoning indicator or has it to be paired up with both as "Not both" to be a 4th group indicator.
Thank you,
I appreciate your help
Hi,
Could someone please help me with interpreting "except" in this sentence?
In order to encourage personal responsibility in adults, society should not restrict the performance of any of the actions of adults or interfere with the likely results except to prevent negative effects on others.
This short premise is originally from PT 69 Section 2 Q15. The way JY interprets except in the sentence is that "if there is interference, then it is to prevent negative effects on others". I understand this logical transition. However, in the syllabus, doesn't he say that "except" is a bi-conditional indicator? So, will we use "except" as a bi-conditional indicator here to translate the logic?
Thank you for the help!!!! I sincerely appreciate any helpful comments.
Admin Note: Edited title. For LR questions, please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."
Did not realize a legislation consist of multiple statements.....
Not gonna lie, I got stuck on this Q2 for 3 mins lmao. It really shows me there are in principle NO easy questions on LSAT