I’m looking for advice from anyone who’s gotten a tutor through 7sage. I’ve completed the core curriculum, taken 10 PT’s and 2 real LSATs (October and November 2022). From the year that I’ve been studying I’ve only gone up 3 points from my diagnostic (157-160). I feel like I’m getting worse with each PT instead of better. Has anyone with a tutor managed to increase +5 or even +10? With me writing again in October, I’m getting desperate 😣
Hi everyone, I need some advice.
I am currently registered to take the October and November LSAT. My issue is that with the October LSAT being a few weeks away, I feel like I am nowhere near where I wanna be in PT's. The October would be my first time taking it. My thought process was to just take the October test to practice run a real exam and have November as my more relaxed test. However, I now feel like I am not prepared for October at all and am debating just taking the November exam. I'm worried that I will freeze up during the November one and not be able to take the test again until January (I wanted to have all my apps in by end of November). Any advice on what I should do? Feeling discouraged :(
@ said:
170+ Jan > mid 160s now. Would only advise if you can basically guarantee you score it though. You run the risk of not getting that score jump in Jan.
Also, schools will automatically hold your application if you are registered for January unless you tell them not to.
You are the best! Thanks for always helping out the 7sage community :)
Feel like many people are also in the same boat- I have also heard that this cycle's admissions has been extremely slow so I am wondering if applying later would hurt my chances. I think I landed mid 160s for November LSAT but I truly think I could get a 170 if I write in Jan. Thoughts?
2 big tips- #1. Full proof! Watch JY's explanation videos and keep doing the same LG set until you can get as many as the inferences described in the videos. Do them over and over until you get all of the inferences. #2- Try and split gameboards any time you can. A big tip, if there are very little rules it's probably best to go straight into the questions. But if there is even on little rule that is an (either/or) its best to split. (Like if M is in K is out, split where 1 GB has K with M out and another where M is in, K is out).
Hope this helps! :)
The stimulus states that skeptics viewed "that" date as too early. With referential phrasing, we can determine "that" as the oldest, deepest sample dated to 19,560 years before the present (in the previous sentence). The skeptics never say that the date of the uppermost sample is too early or inconsistent. If A were true, then the skeptics would have to also have an issue with the uppermost (or present) layer, which they do not. Hope that helped!
@ Wait omg the in person test is still on a computer? Idk why I thought it was paper and pen 😅
If you're confident that you will score higher next time, I wouldn't cancel. Law schools would see your improvement in as little as 2 months and give you some brownie points for that. Even a 2 point improvement would show them how committed you are!
Anyone have any tips on sufficiency/necessity confusions? Struggling hard with these trap AC's #help