lets do it send me a dm or link.

lets do it! I am in should we meet on discord?

Hello I am available every weekday after 8pm and I can do some weekends. Let me know if this works.

araymundo97-1 I made the same mistake. I was able to correctly identify the conclusion but missed the referential statement in-laced in the sentence with the conclusion. The conclusion states (Conclusion in bold, Referential statement in Italic): As plausible as this may sound , at least one thing remains mysterious on this theory. The question I had to ask myself to really get this was. "What is this theory that they are talking about?" Well the theory that they are talking about. Is the fact that the rocks that are next to each other, pass each other and rub each other. This theory unfortunately is missing a piece though, the author says. We don't know why its missing a piece until the author explains it in the following premises. The following premises state heat is the missing piece but no heat is found. I felt that when I thought of it like this. B made sense when it said " The current theory does not fully explain earthquake data." Not "fully explaining something means that it is missing something to its explanation. It was also important for me to understand that our only goal is to look for the main point and nothing else! The fact that we know the missing piece doesn't matter. What matters is that we know the main point, and that the author recognizes that their is a piece missing to the current theory. This language was tricky for me but you learn and live to fight another day. I hope this helps!

I am also interested. Aiming for 165-170.

@sl8492 said:

Hi!

Launching a study group for those looking to:

Take the September LSAT

Score somewhere above a 175

Comment here if you're interested, and I will forward a link in the next day or so.

I am interested as well send the link.