Hi, looking for someone aiming for 175+ & looking to take the LSAT in July! If you are in UofT, would want to hold each other accountable & study together, lmk!
@CMas Actually, now that I am thinking about it, I understand why just frequent works. Because frequency is sufficient to be true by definition. So being frequent is sufficient aka enough to be changed. The same way with your example: if having red -> happy, then as long as I have red, I do not care about anything else e.g., blue. I am thinking about this also in this way. If I get A+ -> happy. It is sufficient. I got an A+ and a note from a teacher saying I am smart. Am I happy because I go an A+? Absolutely, as per the rule. Am I happy because I got a note from a teacher? Sure. Would I be happy if I didn't get a note from a teacher but got an A+? Yes. I would still be happy as per the rule because I have an A+.
@AlisaYudina And also if I only got an email saying I am smart BUT I did not get an A+ would I be happy? I do not know. The rule just says A+ -> happy. So in this case where I did not get an A+ aka /A+, the rule jsut states: /happy -> /A+. Which means that /A+ is a necessary condition. And I can not infer that I am not happy out of the necessary condition of /A+. That would be sufficiency & necessity confusion.