Self-study
I only have research assistant jobs on my resume and going to law school straight out of undergrad. Is that a weak position for the resume? Should I try finding non-research jobs for the summer? Looking at T14 law schools.
AlisaYudina
- Joined
- Jan 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
Goal score: 180
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2027
Discussions
AlisaYudina
Edited Wednesday, Mar 25
So I tried to apply lawgic to this. For the passage it is:
basic, depth, investigatory -> breadth independent -> understand significance.
And then when I translate D into lawgic, it is
analyzed (investigatory), detail (depth) -> easy to understand any (breadth independent)
Which I think is suiting. But what confuses me is the indicator "any" in the "easier to understand any Greek tragedy." Does any here imply that it has to go to the sufficient condition? But then answer choice D doesn't work? Or does "any" just mean "other ones"? Or should I not translate this to lawgic at all?
Do I include the papers I published in undergraduate Journals in my resume? They are not "real" journals I guess, but is it worth including them for a T14 Resume?
Hi, looking for someone aiming for 175+ & looking to take the LSAT in July! If you are in UofT, would want to hold each other accountable & study together, lmk!
UofT LSAT study group
5 members
· Last active 3 weeks ago
AlisaYudina
Tuesday, Feb 3
@AlisaYudina And also if I only got an email saying I am smart BUT I did not get an A+ would I be happy? I do not know. The rule just says A+ -> happy. So in this case where I did not get an A+ aka /A+, the rule jsut states: /happy -> /A+. Which means that /A+ is a necessary condition. And I can not infer that I am not happy out of the necessary condition of /A+. That would be sufficiency & necessity confusion.
AlisaYudina
Tuesday, Feb 3
@CMas Actually, now that I am thinking about it, I understand why just frequent works. Because frequency is sufficient to be true by definition. So being frequent is sufficient aka enough to be changed. The same way with your example: if having red -> happy, then as long as I have red, I do not care about anything else e.g., blue. I am thinking about this also in this way. If I get A+ -> happy. It is sufficient. I got an A+ and a note from a teacher saying I am smart. Am I happy because I go an A+? Absolutely, as per the rule. Am I happy because I got a note from a teacher? Sure. Would I be happy if I didn't get a note from a teacher but got an A+? Yes. I would still be happy as per the rule because I have an A+.
I always watch videos because by the time I watch them I already have done question as part of a drill, in blind review and over again after blind review knowing I got it wrong . I find myself too annoyed &tired of the question to read, so I just watch a video. I also think that the videos breakdowns are more in depth, and I like that it goes chronologically through the question and also a hearing a human voice helps to not get too annoyed at myself.