Hello, is (1) and (2) not apart of the Group 1 translation rules based on the indicator word "All"? I do not get why it clarifies that these "ideas that precede and are distant from"if" can also be sufficient conditions." I thought they were already sufficient conditions because of "All." Can someone please tell me? Thank you!

@Marilyn Hello, I think you are mistaking the options.

It gave the example of

Option 1 is less harmful than option 2.

Option 2 is more harmful than option 1.

In this question with the corns, option 1 is sorgum and option 2 is most other cultivars of corn. Not, option 1 is some cultivars of corn and option 2 is most other cultivars of corn.

We are only swapping the options. The more and less is swinging.

So, if you instead mistook "some" and "most," for swapping or swinging, then that is still incorrect, because "some" is apart of the swinging claim, this means everything stays the same and only the comparative word, in this case, "more" is swung.

"Most" is not the comparative word, instead "most" is apart of the option of "most other cultivars of corn." An option does not change it's wording, only its position.

Sorry, I tried my best explaining it!