Do we have to match wording in the stimulus to the answers for each question? I remember hearing an explanation for a wrong answer for another question I did, use conditional wording even though the stimulus did not. I can see maybe the first sentence in this question could be why the wording in D) makes sense. But, can someone please let me know if wording should be identical every time or sometimes?

I picked B, but on BR, I picked A. I wasn't confident about my answer, I think because A made sense why Highwater fish population didn't rebound, but you have to remember that the conclusion was about the fish population in Quapaw Lake rebounding. So, A) has nothing to do with the conclusion since it concerned Highwater Lake.

Hello, is (1) and (2) not apart of the Group 1 translation rules based on the indicator word "All"? I do not get why it clarifies that these "ideas that precede and are distant from"if" can also be sufficient conditions." I thought they were already sufficient conditions because of "All." Can someone please tell me? Thank you!

@Marilyn Hello, I think you are mistaking the options.

It gave the example of

Option 1 is less harmful than option 2.

Option 2 is more harmful than option 1.

In this question with the corns, option 1 is sorgum and option 2 is most other cultivars of corn. Not, option 1 is some cultivars of corn and option 2 is most other cultivars of corn.

We are only swapping the options. The more and less is swinging.

So, if you instead mistook "some" and "most," for swapping or swinging, then that is still incorrect, because "some" is apart of the swinging claim, this means everything stays the same and only the comparative word, in this case, "more" is swung.

"Most" is not the comparative word, instead "most" is apart of the option of "most other cultivars of corn." An option does not change it's wording, only its position.

Sorry, I tried my best explaining it!