I don't really follow the rules/guidelines that are given in the lessons [negate it and make it the sufficient condition].

I just try to craft a logical statement, should I be attempting to follow these guidelines? Or is intuition enough?

Should I keep going through other lessons if I'm totally lost here?

@jordkerns I feel dumb because I still don't understand why Kumar is not being cited as late.

Is it because the question is "can you draw a valid conclusion that therefore Kumar will be cited as late?". So I'm not being asked to assess the rules of the logic here, but rather we're being asked if Kumar being cited as late is a definite.

I'm still lost because it feels like we're going above and beyond by injecting our own interpretations here, "maybe the staff just didn't feel he deserved a negative citation," and such. And I'm struggling when and where to exercise similar interpretations.