Sometimes I confuse the application of the contrapositive and want to nail it down. I know the example mentioned that "Melissa arrived less than five minutes past the late ring. Therefore, Melissa cannot be cited as late. " I understand why this was a valid argument.

Would it still be valid if the premise about Melissa said something along the lines of her arriving BEFORE the bell rang? Or is that too big of a jump? In typical English logic, this makes sense that she wouldn't be marked late if she arrived before the bell (lol seems incredibly obvious actually), but not sure if that sort of reasoning would fly on the LSAT. Want to cut out bad habits before they start to form. Thanks!

Anyone know how I can print this out? Or at least save as a PDF? I think its very helpful and would like to have on hand, but struggling to get it formatted nicely haha

Interested!