User Avatar
Independent Tutor
Dr.LarsEnden

I am a former philosophy professor with a Ph.D. and over 20 years experience in the college classroom, and I specialize in logic and critical thinking. I have taken all my knowledge and experience in logic and applied it to the LSAT to develop some powerful tools for improving speed and accuracy. No matter where you are in your LSAT journey and no matter what your goals are, I can help you get to that next level. Just reach out and we'll get started!

Discussions

User Avatar
Dr.LarsEnden
Tuesday, Jun 30

@ElizaG61 Hi! Thanks for your interest, but unfortunately, the program has now started, and we are no longer accepting new participants.

1
User Avatar
Dr.LarsEnden
Saturday, Jun 27

@mostxareyallyarezthusmostxarez I am asking everyone to pay on a weekly basis. So, if you want to leave the program at any time, you can simply stop paying and stop showing up.

1

For the last few weeks, I have been advertising here for a new tutoring program that I am trying to get started. I am looking for a very small group of students who are interested in participating in this program. We are about to get started, but there is room for a couple more participants.

The main idea of the program is to make LSAT tutoring more affordable and more efficient by combining group meetings with individual meetings. The content is the same as what I teach to my individual tutoring clients who pay me over 4 times this price and have seen scores into the upper 170s!

See my profile over on Wyzant (look for Lars E.) to see my many 5-star reviews!

If this sounds like it might be for you, please read over the information below carefully, and if you are interested in participating, just send me a message, comment below, or email me (contact@larsenden.com).

This is how the program will work:

·      Everything will be done online. We will use Google Classroom to manage communication and scheduling, and we will use Google Meets for all meetings.

·      There will be 2 group meetings every week, and will occur on Tuesdays and Thursdays 1-2:30 Eastern Time / 10-11:30 Pacific Time (see the schedule below). The typical structure of these meetings is that I will present the topic/skill for the day, and we will work through examples together. It will always be a safe space for asking questions!

·      Homework will be assigned after each meeting to help reinforce concepts and to give you more practice on your own.

·      You will also get one hour of one-on-one tutoring each week, which will be scheduled independently to fit into your personal schedule. These will be tailored to your specific needs and may involve more homework.

·      If you would like additional one-on-one tutoring, it is available for all participants in this program (both during and after the term ends) for $75 per hour, which is less than half of my usual rate.

This is what I will expect from you:

·      Payment of $160 per week payable through Venmo or Paypal before the first group meeting on Tuesday each week. This comes to $40 per hour: 3 hours of group meetings and 1 hour of one-on-one tutoring per week.

·      Attend all group meetings. If you must miss a group meeting, and you want to meet one-on-one to make up for it, there will be an additional charge of $75 per hour for this meeting.

·      Do all homework assignments before the next group meeting. We all need to keep on the same pace!

Here is the schedule:

The program will begin on June 30th and end on August 13th. The schedule for the group meetings is listed below. I don’t expect you to understand what everything on the schedule means right now, but this will give you some idea of how we will proceed. There is a “Vacation Week” in the schedule because that is when I will be on vacation. So, there will be no meetings for that week. Each meeting is designed to build on the previous ones. After the six weeks, you should have all the techniques you need for LR; from there, it is just a matter of improving your skills through practice, practice, practice!

6/30     Introduction to Structural Thinking

7/2       Argument Structures I: Cutting Through the Noise

7/7       Finding Flaws I: Relevance and Ambiguity

7/9       Evaluating Arguments I: Abduction and Adequacy

7/14     Evaluating Arguments II: Induction and World Building

7/16     Statement Structures I: Conditional, Categorical, and Causal Claims

7/21     Evaluating Arguments III: Deduction and Tracing

7/23     Strength and Weakness I: Pushing Worlds Around

7/28     Statement Structures II: Negation

7/30     Strength and Weakness II: Assumptions

Vacation Week

8/11     Finding Flaws II: Presumptions

8/13     Argument Structures II: Advanced Structures

4

[TL;DR $40 per hour for a unique kind of tutoring. Only a few spots remaining!]

For the last few weeks, I have been advertising here for a new tutoring program that I am trying to get started. I am looking for a very small group of students (ideally 6-8) who are interested in participating in this program. Spaces are filling up, but there are still a few spots available.

The main idea of the program is to make LSAT tutoring more affordable and more efficient by combining group meetings with individual meetings. The content is the same as what I teach to my individual tutoring clients who pay me over 4 times this price and have seen scores into the upper 170s!

See my profile over on Wyzant (look for Lars E.) to see my many 5-star reviews!

If this sounds like it might be for you, please read over the information below carefully, and if you are interested in participating, just send me a message, comment below, or email me (contact@larsenden.com).

This is how the program will work:

·      Everything will be done online. We will use Google Classroom to manage communication and scheduling, and we will use Google Meets for all meetings.

·      There will be 2 group meetings every week, and will occur on Tuesdays and Thursdays 2-3:30 Eastern Time / 11-12:30 Pacific Time (see the schedule below). The typical structure of these meetings is that I will present the topic/skill for the day, and we will work through examples together. It will always be a safe space for asking questions!

·      Homework will be assigned after each meeting to help reinforce concepts and to give you more practice on your own.

·      You will also get one hour of one-on-one tutoring each week, which will be scheduled independently to fit into your personal schedule. These will be tailored to your specific needs and may involve more homework.

·      If you would like additional one-on-one tutoring, it is available for all participants in this program (both during and after the term ends) for $75 per hour, which is less than half of my usual rate.

This is what I will expect from you:

·      Payment of $160 per week payable through Venmo or Paypal before the first group meeting on Tuesday each week. This comes to $40 per hour: 3 hours of group meetings and 1 hour of one-on-one tutoring per week. For 6 weeks, this comes to a total of $960 (you could also pay the entire amount up front if you want).

·      Attend all group meetings. If you must miss a group meeting, and you want to meet one-on-one to make up for it, there will be an additional charge of $75 per hour for this meeting.

·      Do all homework assignments before the next group meeting. We all need to keep on the same pace!

Here is the schedule:

The program will begin on June 30th and end on August 13th. The schedule for the group meetings is listed below. I don’t expect you to understand what everything on the schedule means right now, but this will give you some idea of how we will proceed. There is a “Vacation Week” in the schedule because that is when I will be on vacation. So, there will be no meetings for that week. Each meeting is designed to build on the previous ones. After the six weeks, you should have all the techniques you need for LR; from there, it is just a matter of improving your skills through practice, practice, practice!

6/30     Introduction to Structural Thinking

7/2       Argument Structures I: Cutting Through the Noise

7/7       Finding Flaws I: Relevance and Ambiguity

7/9       Evaluating Arguments I: Abduction and Adequacy

7/14     Evaluating Arguments II: Induction and World Building

7/16     Statement Structures I: Conditional, Categorical, and Causal Claims

7/21     Evaluating Arguments III: Deduction and Tracing

7/23     Strength and Weakness I: Pushing Worlds Around

7/28     Statement Structures II: Negation

7/30     Strength and Weakness II: Assumptions

Vacation Week

8/11     Finding Flaws II: Presumptions

8/13     Argument Structures II: Advanced Structures

1

[TL;DR $40 per hour for a unique kind of tutoring]

For the last few weeks, I have been advertising here for a new tutoring program that I am trying to get started. I am looking for a very small group of students (ideally 6-8) who are interested in participating in this program, and some spaces are still available. The main idea of the program is to make LSAT tutoring more affordable and more efficient by combining group meetings with individual meetings. The content is the same as what I teach to my individual tutoring clients who pay me over 4 times this price!

See my profile over on Wyzant (look for Lars E.) to see my many 5-star reviews!

If this sounds like it might be for you, please read over the information below carefully, and if you are still interested in participating, just send me a message, comment below, or email me (contact@larsenden.com).

This is how the program will work:

·      Everything will be done online. We will use Google Classroom to manage communication and scheduling, and we will use Google Meets for all meetings.

·      There will be 2 group meetings every week, which will be run classroom-style and will occur on Tuesdays and Thursdays 2-3:30 Eastern Time / 11-12:30 Pacific Time (see the schedule below). The typical structure of these meetings is that I will present the topic/skill for the day, and we will work through examples together. It will always be a safe space for asking questions!

·      Homework will be assigned after each meeting to help reinforce concepts and to give you more practice on your own.

·      You will also get an hour of one-on-one tutoring each week, which will be scheduled independently to fit into your personal schedule. These will be tailored to your specific needs and may involve more homework.

·      If you would like additional one-on-one tutoring, it is available for all participants in this program (both during and after the term ends) for $75 per hour, which is less than half of my usual rate.

This is what I will expect from you:

·      Payment of $160 per week payable through Venmo or Paypal before the first group meeting on Tuesday each week. This comes to $40 per hour: 3 hours of group meetings and 1 hour of one-on-one tutoring per week. For 6 weeks, this comes to a total of $960 (you could also pay the entire amount up front if you want).

·      Attend all group meetings. If you must miss a group meeting, and you want to meet one-on-one to make up for it, there will be an additional charge of $75 per hour for this meeting.

·      Do all homework assignments before the next group meeting. We all need to keep on the same pace!

Here is the schedule:

The program will begin on June 30th and end on August 13th. The schedule for the group meetings is listed below. I don’t expect you to understand what everything on the schedule means right now, but this will give you some idea of how we will proceed. There is a “Vacation Week” in the schedule because that is when I will be on vacation. So, there will be no meetings for that week. Each meeting is designed to build on the previous ones. After the six weeks, you should have all the techniques you need for LR; from there, it is just a matter of improving your skills through practice, practice, practice!

6/30     Introduction to Structural Thinking

7/2       Argument Structures I: Cutting Through the Noise

7/7       Finding Flaws I: Relevance and Ambiguity

7/9       Evaluating Arguments I: Abduction and Adequacy

7/14     Evaluating Arguments II: Induction and World Building

7/16     Statement Structures I: Conditional, Categorical, and Causal Claims

7/21     Evaluating Arguments III: Deduction and Tracing

7/23     Strength and Weakness I: Pushing Worlds Around

7/28     Statement Structures II: Negation

7/30     Strength and Weakness II: Assumptions

Vacation Week

8/11     Finding Flaws II: Presumptions

8/13     Argument Structures II: Advanced Structures

1
User Avatar
Dr.LarsEnden
Wednesday, Jun 10

Pro tip: when you are stuck between 2 answer choices (or even 3 or 4), DO NOT try to figure out which one is correct! Instead look for a reason to REJECT one of the choices. When you find such a reason, take the other answer choice, and move on! You will be more likely to get the question right (because your own biases are less likely to impact your choice), and it will cost you less time. Good luck out there!

1
User Avatar

Sunday, Jun 7

Dr.LarsEnden

Independent Tutor

Ask a Logic Professor

Hello LSAT Travelers!

My name is Dr. Lars Enden. I used to be a professor of philosophy and logic. I did that for about 20 years. But now, I am an LSAT tutor, and I have been doing this full-time for over 3 years.

The purpose of this group, is to offer a space where you can ask a professional logic professor (that's me!) anything you want. So, come to a session with a topic or a question that you want to discuss. It can be anything LSAT related (even RC, which is mostly logic anyway!) and I will do my best to help you with it. For Free!

The group will meet every Wednesday 2 - 3:30 pm Eastern / 11 am - 12:30 pm Pacific. I hope to see you then!

And, of course, if you are looking for a tutor, check out my post in the tutoring marketplace!

https://7sage.com/join-group/cht_033LpM61OTAwcZv9PxiK0s

Ask a Logic Professor
User AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser Avatar
+47
55 members  ·  Last active 3 days ago
3
User Avatar
Dr.LarsEnden
Tuesday, Jun 2

@fa4664 Sorry, I should have said this in the post, but payment is expected weekly. So, it's $160 per week, payable at the beginning of each week.

1
User Avatar
Dr.LarsEnden
Monday, Jun 1

Not all flaws are about finding a gap. You won't find this is any LSAT prep books, but there are actually only three different kinds of flaws: flaws of relevance, flaws of ambiguity, and flaws of presumption.

Here is a quick breakdown on these different types.

Relevance: the premises are not really relevant to establishing that the conclusion is likely to be true (examples: personal attack, appeals to emotion, popularity, unqualified authority)

Ambiguity: some word or phrase is being used ambiguously in the argument so that it means one thing in one place but means something else in another place (examples: whole/part ambiguity, relative/absolute ambiguity)

Presumption (these are the most common by far on the LSAT): the argument presumes that something is true that is highly questionable (examples: false dichotomy--presumes that there are only two options when there are probably many options, hasty generalization--presumes that a sample is representative of a population when it probably isn't, correlation-causation--presumes that a correlation is sufficient on its own to establish causation when this is doubtful)

"Find the gap" works okay for flaws of presumption (which are the most common on the LSAT), but it works terribly on the other two types. For flaw questions, I would suggest first asking "Are these premises relevant to establishing that the conclusion is likely to be true?" If the argument passes this test, then ask "are there any suspicious words or phrases that might be being used ambiguously?" If it passes this test, then you can ask about a "gap."

I hope this helps.

3
User Avatar
Dr.LarsEnden
Monday, Jun 1

Welcome to the LSAT roller coaster ride! It is perfectly normal to have good days and bad days. I wouldn't read too much into it. So, you were a little off one day. That doesn't really mean anything. I suggest that you just take a deep breath and let it go!

2
User Avatar
Dr.LarsEnden
Edited Saturday, May 30

About questions 2: Notice that this question stem begins with "According to the Passage." The current LSAT tends to use this phrase exclusively to mean that we are looking for something that the passage explicitly says, and not for something that we can infer from what the passage explicitly says. However, this is from PT 104, which is a quite old LSAT, and back in those days, the LSAT used the phrase "According to the passage" more liberally than it does now. This is one of the reasons that it is best to practice with more recent PTs if possible. Anyway, this is an inference questions in disguise.

So, you are right that the relevant part of the passage cannot be taken to literally mean that there was some overlap and there was some non-overlap between the memberships of the civil bar and the ecclesiastic bar; still it is heavily implied that there was some non-overlap simply because the author says "some" instead of "all." This is what is known as a conversational implicature, which means that the sentence does not logically imply answer choice (A), but it does conversationally imply (A) because it would just be weird for the author to say "some" when "all" would have been more informative.

About questions 7: Consider the sentence before the bit that you quoted: "One might expect that the professional associations would play a prominent role in enforcing these standards of conduct, as other guilds often did, and as modern professional associations do, but that seems not to have happened" [emphasis added]. This shows that answer choice (D) is wrong because it turns out that there certainly were other guilds that were apparently not finding it all that difficult to enforce discipline. I think you were taking "Advocates' guilds" as representative of all guilds.

I hope this helps.

Good luck, and if you are looking for tutoring support, consider me. I'm a former logic professor, and my current rates are $130/hr. I'm also current working on a pilot program for an alternative kind of tutoring. For more info, check out my post in the tutoring marketplace: https://7sage.com/discussion/59135/a-different-kind-of-tutoring-from-a-different-kind-of-tutor-ph-d-in-philosophy-and-logic-dollar40-hr

2
User Avatar
Dr.LarsEnden
Saturday, May 30

I personally think that "find the gap" is overrated. Don't get me wrong, it's great for sufficient assumption, and works reasonable well for many flaw questions, but I don't like it for strengthen or weaken questions. The reason is that it is simply not true that there is one and only one thing that will strengthen or weaken any given argument. There are a lot of things that can strengthen or weaken a given argument. So, coming up with some "gap" in the argument is not necessarily what the question is going to be looking for. In fact, some hard LR questions are designed to prey upon your preconceived biases about what strengthens or weakens the argument.

Anyway, I teach a completely different approach to strengthening and weakening to my students that doesn't depend on finding a gap at all.

If you are interested in learning more, I offere tutoring services. I'm a former logic professor, and my current rates are $130/hr. I'm also current working on a pilot program for an alternative kind of tutoring. For more info, check out my post in the tutoring marketplace: https://7sage.com/discussion/59135/a-different-kind-of-tutoring-from-a-different-kind-of-tutor-ph-d-in-philosophy-and-logic-dollar40-hr

1
User Avatar
Dr.LarsEnden
Saturday, May 30

Timed work is always going to introduce errors that would not be there in more careful and slow work. That is a reality we must live with. However, since you mentioned that you feel more relaxed during blind review, I would guess that you are overly stressed during the timed test, which can cause "spiralling." Does this kind of thinking happen to you a lot: "Oh no, I've spent too much time on the first 10 questions, I need to pick up the pace, but this question is so long and confusing. I'll never figure this one out. This is going terribly! On no!!"

Take a breath! That's all. The past is the past, but the rest of the test is in the future, and that is the challenge before you. So, take a breath, and let the past go! Refocus and move on.

This is easier said than done of course, but my main point is that minimizing errors requires being relaxed yet focused. This isn't easy to do under time pressure, but paying attention to your body and in particular your breathing can help a ton!

Good luck, and if you are looking for tutoring support, consider me. I'm a former logic professor, and my current rates are $130/hr. I'm also current working on a pilot program for an alternative kind of tutoring. For more info, check out my post in the tutoring marketplace: https://7sage.com/discussion/59135/a-different-kind-of-tutoring-from-a-different-kind-of-tutor-ph-d-in-philosophy-and-logic-dollar40-hr

2
User Avatar
Dr.LarsEnden
Saturday, May 30

Nice work!

1
User Avatar
Dr.LarsEnden
Saturday, May 30

What you are experiencing is the major learning gulf that exists between understanding why a given answer is the correct answer and being able to adjust your thinking so that you don't make similar mistakes again. There is a big gap beween these two things, and it is very hard to jump over that gap without a lot, a lot, a lot of practice (and the aid of a good tutor helps a ton!).

Based on my experience tutoring many, many students for the LSAT, I would guess that your major issue is that you do not yet have a firm grasp on argument structures. The ability to cut through the noise and get to the underlying argument structure is the most important skill you must develop for LSAT improvement! I would suggest that you do a little slow work -- find some drill questions that have arguments in the stimulus and carefully work out exactly what the conclusion is, and exactly what the premises (support) are, and distinguish all of this from the noise. Despite appearances, arguments are not composed of words; they are composed of ideas. This means that any argument can be expressed in all kinds of different ways. The best trick that the LSAT has is to present its arguments in the most convoluted way that they can dream up. The better you are at cutting through all the noise and pulling out that argument structure, the better you are going to be at logical reasoning.

Good luck, and if you are looking for tutoring support, consider me. I'm a former logic professor, and my current rates ar $130/hr. I'm also current working on a pilot program for an alternative kind of tutoring. For more info, check out my post in the tutoring marketplace: https://7sage.com/discussion/59135/a-different-kind-of-tutoring-from-a-different-kind-of-tutor-ph-d-in-philosophy-and-logic-dollar40-hr

1
User Avatar

Edited Friday, May 29

Dr.LarsEnden

Independent Tutor

Ask a Logic Professor

Hello LSAT Travelers!

My name is Dr. Lars Enden. I used to be a professor of philosophy and logic. I did that for about 20 years. But now, I am an LSAT tutor, and I have been doing this full-time for over 3 years.

The purpose of this group, is to offer a space where you can ask a professional logic professor (that's me!) anything you want. So, come to a session with a topic or a question that you want to discuss. It can be anything LSAT related (even RC, which is mostly logic anyway!) and I will do my best to help you with it. For Free!

The group will meet every Wednesday 2 - 3:30 pm Eastern / 11 am - 12:30 pm Pacific. I hope to see you then!

And, of course, if you are looking for a tutor, check out my post in the tutoring marketplace!

https://7sage.com/join-group/cht_033LpM61OTAwcZv9PxiK0s

Ask a Logic Professor
User AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser Avatar
+47
55 members  ·  Last active 3 days ago
1

[TL;DR: $40 per hour for a unique kind of tutoring opportunity!]

Hello LSAT Travelers!

My name is Dr. Lars Enden. I used to be a professor of philosophy and logic. I did that for about 20 years. But now, I have taken all my experience as a professional educator in logic and critical thinking and applied it to the LSAT. LSAT tutoring is all that I do now, and I have been doing it full-time for over 3 years.

If you would like to see my many 5-star reviews from former students, check out my profile over on Wyzant (look up Lars E.).

There are 2 problems that I see with LSAT tutoring. The first problem is that it is expensive for students; the second problem is that it is repetitive for tutors; I find myself teaching the same skills to practically every student that I tutor.

I propose to solve both of these problems by introducing a hybrid style of tutoring, which will combine some group instruction with one-on-one individual tutoring at a more affordable price.

I am launching a pilot program that will use this hybrid model to cover the logical reasoning portion of the LSAT (I hope to develop a similar program for Reading Comprehension in the future). It will be a 6-week program that will meet as a group twice a week for 1.5 hours each, and that will meet individually with each student for one-on-one tutoring 1-hour per week. This will mean that each student gets 24 hours of total time divided into 18 hours of classroom-style instruction (with the whole group) and 6 hours of one-on-one tutoring. I want to try this method with a relatively small cohort (6-8 students) priced at $960 per student, which comes to $40 per hour. I expect that if this program is successful, that I will end up charging at least 3 times more than this in the future, which is still far below my usual rates for regular one-on-one tutoring.

What to expect from this program:

-24 hours of total time: 18 hours of small-group time and 6 hours of individual tutoring time.

-Current cost will be $960, which breaks down to $40 per hour [This is far, far lower than my usual rate because this is a new and somewhat experimental program]

-Classes are designed to cover all the important logical skills needed for LR success [these are the same skills that I have been teaching my individual tutoring students for years]

-Individual tutoring time will be more focused on the specific problems each student is facing with improving their LR skills

-Targeted homework will be assigned after each class to help reinforce the concepts and to give students more practice [This is the same homework that I have been giving to my individual tutoring students for years]

-For students in this cohort, I will also offer additional tutoring, if desired, both during and after the class ends at $75 per hour (more than half my usual rate)

If you are interested in being a part of this pilot program, please send me a message, comment below, or send me an email to contact@larsenden.com

5
User Avatar

Edited Thursday, May 28

Dr.LarsEnden

Independent Tutor

Ask a Logic Professor

Hello LSAT Travellers!

My name is Dr. Lars Enden. I used to be a professor of philosophy and logic. I did that for about 20 years. But now, I am an LSAT tutor, and I have been doing this full-time for over 3 years.

The purpose of this group, is to offer a space where you can ask a professional logic professor (that's me!) anything you want. So, come to a session with a topic or a question that you want to discuss. It can be anything LSAT related (even RC, which is mostly logic anyway!) and I will do my best to help you with it. For Free!

The group will meet every Wednesday 2 - 3:30 pm Eastern / 11 am - 12:30 pm Pacific. I hope to see you then!

And, of course, if you are looking for a tutor, check out my post in the tutoring marketplace!

Ask a Logic Professor
User AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser Avatar
+47
55 members  ·  Last active 3 days ago
3

Confirm action

Are you sure?