User Avatar
Independent Tutor
Dr.LarsEnden

I am a former philosophy professor with a Ph.D. and over 20 years experience in the college classroom, and I specialize in logic and critical thinking. I have taken all my knowledge and experience in logic and applied it to the LSAT to develop some powerful tools for improving speed and accuracy. No matter where you are in your LSAT journey and no matter what your goals are, I can help you get to that next level. Just reach out and we'll get started!

Discussions

User Avatar

2 days ago

Dr.LarsEnden

Independent Tutor

Ask a Logic Professor

Hello LSAT Travellers!

My name is Dr. Lars Enden. I used to be a professor of philosophy and logic. I did that for about 20 years. But now, I am an LSAT tutor, and I have been doing this full-time for over 3 years.

The purpose of this group, is to offer a space where you can ask a professional logic professor (that's me!) anything you want. So, come to a session with a topic or a question that you want to discuss. It can be anything LSAT related (even RC, which is mostly logic anyway!) and I will do my best to help you with it. For Free!

The group will meet on Wednesdays 2 - 3:30 pm Eastern / 11 am - 12:30 pm Pacific. I hope to see you then!

And, of course, if you are looking for a tutor, check out my post in the tutoring marketplace!

Ask a Logic Professor
User AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser AvatarUser Avatar
+10
18 members  ·  Last active 3 hours ago
2

Hello LSAT travellers!

My name is Dr. Lars Enden. I used to be a professor of philosophy and logic. I did that for about 20 years. But now, I have taken all my experience as a professional educator in logic and critical thinking and applied it to the LSAT. LSAT tutoring is all that I do now, and I have been doing it full-time for over 3 years.

If you would like to see my many 5-star reviews from former students, check out my profile over on Wyzant (look up Lars E.).

There are 2 problems that I see with LSAT tutoring. The first problem is that it is expensive for students; the second problem is that it is repetitive for tutors; I find myself teaching the same skills to practically every student that I tutor.

I propose to solve both of these problems by introducing a hybrid style of tutoring, which will combine some classroom-style instruction with one-on-one individual tutoring at a more affordable price.

Therefore, I am launching a pilot program that will use this hybrid model to cover the logical reasoning portion of the LSAT (I hope to develop a similar program for Reading Comprehension in the future). It will be a 6-week program that will meet classroom-style twice a week for 1.5 hours each, and that will meet individually with each student for one-on-one tutoring 1-hour per week. This will mean that each student gets 24 hours of total time divided into 18 hours of classroom-style instruction (with the whole group) and 6 hours of one-on-one tutoring. I want to try this method with a relatively small cohort (6-8 students) priced at $960 per student, which comes to $40 per hour. I expect that if this program is successful, that I will end up charging at least 3 times more than this in the future, which is still far below my usual rates for regular one-on-one tutoring.

What to expect from this program:

-24 hours of total time: 18 hours of small-group time and 6 hours of individual tutoring time.

-Current cost will be $960, which breaks down to $40 per hour [This is far, far lower than my usual rate because this is a new and somewhat experimental program]

-Classes are designed to cover all the important logical skills needed for LR success [these are the same skills that I have been teaching my individual tutoring students for years]

-Individual tutoring time will be more focused on the specific problems each student is facing with improving their LR skills

-Targetted homework will be assigned after each class to help reinforce the concepts and to give students more practice [This is the same homework that I have been giving to my individual tutoring students for years]

-For students in this cohort, I will also offer additional tutoring, if desired, both during and after the class ends at $95 per hour (less than half my usual rate)

If you are interested in being a part of this pilot program, please send me a DM, comment below, or send me an email at contact@larsenden.com

2
User Avatar
Dr.LarsEnden
Friday, May 15

When you hear sufficient, you should think "enough," as in "I have had sufficient food for today." So, the sufficient condition is the one that is enough to ensure the truth of the other condition.

When you hear necessary, you should think "needed," as in "Food is necessary for my survival." [In other words, if you take away the food, I will not survive.] So, the necessary condition is the one that is needed for the other condition to be true.

Example: If it is raining, then the streets are wet.

"It is raining" is the sufficient condition because it is enough to bring about the wet streets. (Notice that the rain is not needed to bring about the wet streets because the streets can be wet for other reasons.)

"The streets are wet" is the necessary condition because it is needed for the rain. That might sound kind of weird, but if you think about it, taking away the wet streets would mean that we also have to take away the rain. So, the wet streets are in fact needed for the rain.

In general, the "if" part of a conditional is the sufficient condition, and the "then" part is the necessary condition.

4

Confirm action

Are you sure?