DeniseDenault's comment explained "only if" as a minimum requirement. That along with drawing the visual make it click for me. 5+ being the larger circle and Late being the smaller. You can put being 17 min past anywhere in the 5+ circle, including the L circle, but it does not have to make sense.

Seeing the visual helped me connect the dots. Being 5+ puts you in the circle but it does not NECESSARILY mean you will also be in the smaller L circle. It's the minimum condition that needs to be met for the possibility of being cited as late to occur.

@AnnabelleNeidl Great way to put it

@QuintonWThiessen This is great take. I think many of us, including myself, assumed by "pet" it must be able to be kept and treated in the same way as other traditional pets.

I have owned "pet" tarantulas. Never handled them as doing so would open the opportunity for bodily harm. However, what made them great pets imo were there ease of care, low cost, and interesting behavior to observe.

The Tiger argument suggests that likelihood of bodily harm is the only metric to measure if an animal is a good pet or not. It is not a weak argument, just not as black and white as the Disney argument.