good catch!!!

insane how the exact same happened to me

same question. I can eliminate all other ACs but I don't know how (A) is supported at all

#feedback

Agreed - i was looking for this response in the comments! (B) tells you that the low-income people are already burdened by income tax, but not that this policy caused or demanded this burden.

I'm curious if we could eliminate (A) just by chronology - because at the first paragraph, the author has not gotten to particular theories, he couldn't have supported it?#feedback

The author is ambivalent about the pervasiveness of LHB, not about whether the rock came from mars.

I wonder if we can eliminate (B) and (D) because they came up much later than this quote, so that the author couldn't have intended them? Would this be a valid strategy? Thank you!