Have been doing amazing in all other sections - Can't at all wrap my head around how it's an "obvious" hypothesis that the owner stole the diamonds. We've been taught the entire curriculum not to supply outside assumptions into the argument, and that seems to be what we did to the stimulus in-order to draw similarities to answer choice A. I can't see why it isn't D other than for the fact that the hypothesis in answer choice D is "plausible" - yet the hypothesis in D seems anything but plausible to me when there can be hundreds of other reasons why her cavities formed that way, and similarly, why it isn't plausible that the thief did in-fact just wear gloves.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aside from the discrepancy pointed out in the video, isn't it is also different to say that vegetarian DIETS don't always cause nutritional deficiencies, than it is to say that VEGETARIANISM can lead to nutritional deficiencies. I got this question right, however the discrepancy my mind first picked up was the difference between the diets causing the deficiencies, and vegetarianism itself causing the deficiencies.