I would argue that the Disney vacation club is the strongest because its premises account for 'all' eventualities. To get the pass you must have done either a or b. Additionally, it is extremely detailed in conveying its logical steps. I would argue that the tiger argument is supported, but there are grounds for 'yeah but' that are not quite covered by the writer. For instance, we must make the assumption that aggression is tied to insuitability. We must tie that to be a pet, the animal cannot kill people. The argument also leaves ground for someone saying, well, what if the tiger is tame, what is other animals that are well-known pets like dogs or cat cause injuries to people? It is easier to dismantle the argument. The trash bin argument does a decent job of qualifying the claim ('my hypothesis is') but it falls into the same 'yeah but' problem as the tiger one. What is there was a strong breeze in the kitchen for some reason? What if someone broke in? What if the dog knocked down the trashcan? As the argument does not account for these questions, it is severely weakened.

Hi everyone! I'm from Florida and take a practice exam a few months back where I got a 155. Unfortunately, my studying completely stalled, but I'm planing to start a fresh and get a 173+ by the summer! Best of luck to everyone here