Self-study
JBURGer2
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Answer D is so close to being right but here is why I think it is wrong.
It basically states one of the moral obligations that could override the initial premise that there's an obligation to protect your family. I initially read that and thought of the moral obligation to obey the law and not obstruct justice so you don't wind up in jail also.
But I guess there are other moral obligations like the moral obligation to help find the perpetrator of said crime to help a member of your community for example. so that is why Answer D is just too narrow.
Does this make sense? Is this the way I should be evaluating answer choices?