@reednaijae this might be a little late. I take it from this comment that you are still viewing the LSAT as a regular standardized test like the SAT where it examines your memory and knowledge of concepts and mathematics. The LSAT does not test your knowledge about a subject and it onyl tests your comprehension and reasoning skills on arguments that you are provided with. nothing more nothing less. The LSAt assumes that you have at least a college-level education and assumes you know what a lawyer or a chemist is but thats just basic background knowledge. You allso say that boring topics make it hard to pay attention and understand the stimulus. That's what you will be doing as a lawyer, reading hundreds of pages of boring case precedent and taking assignments that you don't care for. Do you think Supreme Court justices are experts about cases about Medicine, Climate Change, Business no they are not! All they do is look for gaps and understandings of legislation that they are familiar with, and then they try to determine what is the most coherent and consistent argument with the Constitution. if you want to be a criminal lawyer then you will probobly get cases that you dont care for about covering but you will have to if you are a public defender.

i will be graduating undergradu(psychology) with a GPA of around 2.8 and my goal LSAT is a round 170-180. my goal schools are T-15 and anywhere around T-30 would be great. i know i would be a super splitter. how realistic that as a traditional applicant would be my chances in T-15 and not URM.

Awesome!

@HayshahBlot there is none for the lessons.