Hi everyone!
I took my first LSAT this month and received a 158, which is 7 points below my average PT score. I actually felt I had bombed the test as soon as I finished it, so the result wasn't too surprising...
In hindsight, I probably didn't prepare it in the best way. I was short on time and ended up taking seven full PrepTests in the ten days leading up to the exam, which may have contributed to burnout and underperformance. My highest PT score was a 171, and the 158 is lower than every PT score on record.
My dream schools are in the T6, and I'm planning to retake in August. Given this context, would you recommend canceling the 158 or keeping it?
I'd really appreciate any advice - thanks so much in advance! :)
For those struggling between b and c, here's how I understand it now:
b - the key to rule out b is "there is no practical difference". The stimulus only says the difference between resolution is irrelevant to the practical aspect of photography, not that there is no practical difference among modern cameras by virtue of their image qualities. The two cameras can still produce images of different qualities, not in terms of the degree of detail, but something else.