Hey, wondering if anyone has some more up-to-date information on this, is it okay to mumble quietly to yourself / read to yourself during the LSAT? I find it helps a lot with my understanding in RC sections. Thanks and good luck studying! If it helps I planned on taking it remotely, but any information is appreciated.
Maybe I'm being a bit pedantic, but I feel like the reasoning on question 4 (that it's not clear whether being expected to make tough decisions implies having the ability to make touch decisions) could just as easily be applied to question 5. The final statement reads, "Spellcasters who can't cast ninth-level spells still have more to learn." To me, spellcasters would imply a different group from Wizards (this is an assumption, but wizards would likely be a subset of the spellcasters superset) and shouldn't be used to group the two.
I got confused on exercise 2: When working on my own, I used /Assassination to represent the assassination failing, is there any real difference between using AAF and /Assassination, and if so how can I tell when to put a negation on a statement? It seems intuitive to me that an assassination failing would be negation of an assassination succeeding.