@haena Thank you, this was genuinely insightful.

How come I only had 12 questions? What are people talking about with 15 questions?

Do people get different passages?

You're telling me all this time women have been conscious? Oh brother do I have some thinking to do.

I just don’t understand why we’re suppose to assume that C broadens to mean all first graders. I figured it was talking about the 100 first graders in the study. In which case, it’s not telling us anything new.

@AbhinavSMandava I'm not a tutor, so maybe take this with a grain of salt, but I was not satisfied with the answer in response to your thoughts regarding B. I was between B and D. My thought process with B was that wealthier countries tend to have higher life expectancies, and higher life expectancies mean more people getting cancer. I've always been told that cancer is an old person's disease.

The reason that I eliminated B and went with D had more to do with the answer choice in relation to the stimulus. The Stimulus has a definitive correlation. The higher the fat intake, the higher the incidence of cancer in that country. B only says that fat intake tends to correlate with wealth. This tells me that some country exists that is poor and still has high fat and high cancer rate. So it doesn't destroy the reasoning like we want. In contrast with D, we get another definitive correlation between high fat and high levels of pollution. Which does a much better job of providing a possible alternative. We also have to make less assumptions that we pull from the real world. Pollution-> cancer vs. wealth->age->cancer.

Hope this helps.