Hi- I just don't understand how "greater numbers of animals belonging to each species" doesn't conflict with "can support its current wildlife populations without strain". wouldn't any increase in population be bad for the argument? because that would mean it'd be straining the park? i thought this was more of a "solve the discrepancy" question with explaining the increase in wildlife but not straining the park. therefore i feel like E is the best... because it's saying "hey the plants were actually here the whole time but it SEEMS that there was an increase but its not an increase that will strain the park". how is that not the best answer? A seems like it weakens the argument because it points out the strain!