my mistake was: I confused 'supplemented' with 'replaced'.

I guessed E only cuz it felt right by process of elimination, but I still did not understand the stem till I read the analysis. it wouldve made more sense to me by ending it with: Most people feel like theyre only needed in their friends/family cuz their job could be done by other people so thats why they feel special cuz theyre the only ones that get chosen for it.

If you ask me, it would make sense if people felt 'indispensable' if they knew theyre job COULD NOT be done by others. So it threw me off.

i know what you mean. sometimes i feel my brain gets stuck and having taken a 200 level logic class in college still didn't help me. The purpose of having to use conditionals is different.

I always refer back to what i was first taught:

If it rains (Sufficient) then the floor is wet (Necessary)

If it does not rain, does the mean that the floor can still be wet? yes! a hose went off, someone peed, etc.

It does not have to necessarily rain in order for it be wet.

Interested

Ok to be completely honest I had no fucking clue what the farmer meant by "ears on screen", I had no idea he was still talking about kernels.

Wait, I thought the question said the commute increased TO & FROM their homes in the suburbs and the downtown area.

I confused maintenance with reconstruction. Read this so wrong.

So I did not choose A simply because I definitely know NOTHING about plowing, or churning in the context of planting. And I know outside information shouldn't matter, but I dont know what to imagine when I read 'churning' or 'plowing' - since I dont know anything about planting. And since the stimulus did not mentioning anything at all about actual PLANTS GROWING, I automatically eliminated A because I don't know if all the churning or plowing guarantees or let alone relates to 'GROWING' the actual plant. I really just thought they were talking about the seeds, regardless of them being grown. I genuinely thought that the plants growing is either not supported or neutral in regards to MSS scale.

I thought the credit ONLY meant ONLY in the INSTANCE of a subscription missing.

I read it as we ONLY give credit in this instance that we miss to send a subscription , and you reported it within 24 hrs & we don't have one to replace.

Not for the other instances or hypotheticals listed.