LumosLsat
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Discussions
LumosLsat
Thursday, Jun 8, 2023
#help for 17 I did
Domain: manufacturer’s actions whose consequences harm innocent people
held-resp → consq-prev
Why is it the other way around? Please help I am so confused!
LumosLsat
Tuesday, May 30, 2023
#help For number 3: I thought "unless" is negative sufficient how is this translated to W→T
For number 4: How is "mix" sufficient and "increase" is necessary? Should this just be looked at as "if...then..." clause?
#help
Q9:
I translated its as:
Rule: wrong → intent-misrep
Exception: acting-in-interest
How do I know whch statement to put on either side of the arrow. I am struggling with this.
#feedback