Did anyone else completely miss what the term "current" is doing for this stimulus lol? because even with blind review I had difficulty seeing why the passage goes from talking about the past to the present and that's because I missed the word current in the second sentence and that completely changed how i interpreted the stimulus sigh

So without watching the explanation vid: Can I infer that we are treating what is set up in the premise as a sufficient reason for the company acting unfairly because of the phrase "perhaps they recalled"? That is Lindsey is inferring a reason for people thinking the company acted unfairly but Lindsey doesn't actually know for sure and so it could be a sufficient reason but not the only one?

I don't do too many PTs admittedly and I try to focus on drilling. Aiming for mid-170s in January LOL. Thank you guys for doing this!!