There are some important key differences here that I keep missing,

E says "The argument never asserts that anything “should” or “should not” be the case. The argument makes only descriptive claims about what’s necessary for freedom, or what will happen if an external force intervenes. It doesn’t make any prescriptive claims recommending something or advocating a policy"

which shows that in this case should and necessary are very different. I need to remember that these words are very important and need to train myself to pick up on them especially for questions like conforms where i match as much as possible.

c matches best.

I need to ask myself the why.

What is the conclusion and why did they make it. This is not just items that could be assumed but items that are absolutely needed if true. These cannot be predicted easily.

@gabbithaa that would work for me!!

I chose C then E

Correct answer B

When initially reading the premise I misunderstood proofs as general work which led me to have a mild misunderstanding of everything. What the premise is really saying is proof like evidence (Im DUMB). So, C would be very wrong since the premise that COMPUTER DEPENDENT PROOFS are less certain because are literally unable to do the same things. C is saying the degree of certainty is reduced but thats not really what the premise is telling us. I chose e because I could not think of another answer it could possibly be but B makes the most sense as we are told that we cannot verify computer only proofs ie B.

Hello!! Im new to the idea of having an lsat study buddy so how would it work?? Im also from LA.