Yall are CHURNING these out

I see how D is wrong, but unclear why E isnt wrong for the same reason. E doesnt say "...the Super XL had been used first it would have left behind THE SAME DIRT as did the old vacuum cleaner". It mentions the quantity just as D did.

I got held up over the use of "easy" over "not difficult". With the LSAT, I get confused when to take things literally, and when to let things be flexible. Because saying E is right because it would be "easy" I think is descriptively inaccurate since we only know the conditions if something is "not difficult". I went with D because I thought it was more descriptively accurate, even though it didn't necessarily touch on exclusive permission on returning late. I totally see and agree that E is right, just unsure when I should take things literally and when its best not to.

If I can offer some feedback about some of these explanations, the tone that something is obvious is really unhelpful. If Im watching something for information, it's clearly not obvious to me. And I find when the tutor finds it obvious, we blow through the explanation.