- Joined
- Nov 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
I am struggling with this because it seems the approach keeps changing. I chose AC B to eliminate the possibility that start time could have affected productivity, therefore strengthening that it in fact was nutrition. I did not pick AC A because the stimulus states that "workers in Plant B did not."
I thought restating premise did not help the arguments in strengthen/weaken. What am I missing? I really need a better explanation/understanding of this.
I took the bait and confused "emissions" and "speed." This one is like handing away a point.
I thought C was the trap because of how easy it was. I guess that was the trap and I fell for it.
@Wasi Thanks for sharing! I'm working on slowing down for RC. Low res and other strategies that I have tried haven't worked for me. Slowing down has helped, I've just got to train my brain to slow down without panicking lol. I'm better on LR, just got to stop second guessing myself.
Keep up the good work. Good luck!
AC A is definitely not easy one to pick. The only way is POE. That "qualified" made me cross is real quick.
It seems like AC A attacks a premise (I thought so as well and that's why I chose AC B). That would have been the case if the last sentence said "anyone who opposes higher taxes will make a better leader than someone who supports them." But the statement has "Many would agree" which makes it an opinion and not a fact. So, AC A does not attack any premise.
I mainly didn't pick E because "Reading to children at an early age" vs. "children who have not been read to". Two different sets. Whereas, the stimulus talks about students.
I did not pick A because the passage states "shift the risk of not recovering those costs, and of not obtaining a damages award that will pay their lawyer's fees, from the client to the lawyer." How is that "transferring the risk of pursuing a legal action from the client to the lawyer."?
@Chebebe Absolutely, work on that stamina and you're gold.
During BR, do you write down your thoughts on which answers were attractive, why were those attractive, why you didn't pick the right one, etc.? I have been doing that lately and it has been helping me identify my behavior under timed drills. That's another thing that may help you identify what to focus on and what to avoid during timed drills.
For RC specifically, are you doing low-res and MP before moving on to the questions? It only takes a minute more but when I do it, I find answering questions easier and quicker than when I don't. I'm forcing myself to get into the habit of doing low-res and MP before moving to the questions. Just sharing some tips that have been working for me.
You got this! Good luck!
What has been helping me with RC is sacrificing one passage in order to allocate more time on three passages and try to get near perfect on them. I take my time on three and skim one and answer its questions quickly. Not bulletproof, but this strategy has helped me.
EDIT: If you are not already, make sure you are doing low-res for each para and MP before even looking at the questions. That helps reinforce the structure of the passage.
Based on this performance I think your issue maybe fatigue. Your logic is solid, based on your BR. Do you get more anxious or tired by each section?
I have chronic anxiety. Honestly, my ADHD medication has been helping a lot. I was diagnosed a few months ago and have been on medication. I will also apply for accommodation. Drilling with additional time has been helping me keep my anxiety in check. Talk to your doctor as soon as you can, get medication/therapy, and apply for accommodation. Good luck!
Not sure if this is an update but I just noticed Sage AI usage limit. Sage AI analysis were really helping me improve and now one single AI response is using 2% of my monthly limit. The subscription is expensive as is, now there's a limit on AI usage. I'm really disappointed!
No shade to JY, but Kevin is quite thorough with RC passages, questions and ACs. He takes his time to explain what makes each AC right or wrong. That really makes a big difference.
Here's why I picked A over E:
Currie understood that radiation was happening, but she couldn't explain how it was happening, as in what was causing it to happen.
She described radiation (theory) but was not able to explain how it was happening (mechanism/physical process of atoms losing mass).
I was attracted to B originally but talked myself out of it because I was stuck on "ozone-depleting gases" ban. Chlorine being one of those gases. Re-reading the passage (banned gas CFC) and question stem (MSS) made AC B the clear winner. I didn't like any other answer choices but picked E in panic (damned assumptions!).
@Igotthis123 The first line of Para 2 explicitly states "The form of the novel parallels the three-stage structure noted by anthropologists..." That is a give away for an analogy.
I'm not sure if a form filled by a therapist will be acceptable for accommodation on LSAT. From what I've read and heard, a psychiatrist should fill it out for it to be acceptable.
agriculture system = crop cultivation + cattle economy.