Tried to beat the time and ended up with 1/3. Blind reviewed with no time pressure 3/3. Got the concept but too slow still. :(((

I got it right but was 47 secs over. I'm understanding the concept, thanks 7Sage :). But reading the question and all the answer choices takes up a lot of time :(

Memorizing the indicator words is the key! And in case of "no" and "unless/until" in the same sentence, going with the later made it easy. Took the "no" just as a negation and not group 4.

All cats (subset) are mammals (superset). So, mammal club's membership is necessary to be in the cat club.

But not all mammals are cats. So, cat club membership is sufficient, but not necessary, to be in the mammal club.

A cat must be a mammal. But a mammal may or may not be a cat.

The structure of the program is to help the students understand the fundamentals first so drills and tests will be easier and make more sense. I did some drills on LawHub before registering for 7Sage and I'm finding all the lessons very helpful. You are investing your time (and money) for a better LSAT score. But if you feel like you have the fundamentals down, you can skip to the drills and come back to the material if the need be.

I had to postpone taking the test this year due to two back to back surgeries which took me 4 months to heal. I now have finally started to prepare for LSAT. I work full-time so have limited time to devote to preparation. Besides LSAT I have school applications to complete.

My GPA is 3.9. I've registered for Feb 2026. Should I change it to April 2026? Or should I miss another year and thoroughly prepare for LSAT and school applications?

If I apply now, I basically only have a couple of schools to get into (which is ok). And I need GOOD scholarship because these schools are EXPENSIVE!

I wish they had videos for these lessons. I'm wasting way too much time trying to confirm if I got the examples right. This is so annoying.

Did I get it wrong?

"All" is from group 1-necessity conditional indicators, where what follows immediately after the indicator, in this case "all", is the necessary condition. So, lawgic would be:

All Jedi use the Force.

J -> F

Dooku use force:

D -> F

Dooku is Jedi:

D -> J. This conclusion is not valid from the given premise.

In case of "only", its from group 2-sufficiency conditional indicators. What follows immediately after the indicator, "only", is the sufficient condition. So, lawgic would be:

Only Jedi use the Force.

F -> J

Dooku uses the Force.

D -> F

Chaining conditionals:

D -> F -> J

D -> J

We can infer from the above that Dooku is Jedi, which is the conclusion in the argument.

Answered correctly but took 3:42 minutes. Not sure if at this point I should be as worried about my speed.