How is the conclusion invalid if we are to accept that the premises are true? I thought that because the AAF, she would give her speech because she is alive. I believe it depends on what question this is. If it was a weaken question then yes we can weaken the conclusion by saying there were other assassination attempts.

I have a question concerning C. The stimulus says that the herniated disk mush have been damaged before chronic back pain develops. Isn't that what C is saying? That one doesn't initially feel pain. Please can you explain fully why C is wrong because the tutor did not do a good job explaining why C is wrong and E is correct.

Hey! So i did not choose B because the stimulus never mentioned anything about unrefined gold. How do you know that some gold was less that 92% when the stimulus clearly said that all gold coins from senegal was not less than 92%

Wait if there was an increase in family income in 1996, how does that not weaken the argument.

I am very confused with this lesson. Can you provide a video example or something? thank you.

Hey, I am really trying to understand this topic. So if bravery is necessary and not sufficient for Gryffindor, does that mean that other things pus bravery is sufficient for Gryffindor. I sincerely still do not understand how bravery is not sufficient for Gryffindor if in the stimulus if you have bravery you will be selected.