User Avatar
Omokheshi
Joined
Jun 2025
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
165
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2026

Discussions

User Avatar
Omokheshi
Monday, Jul 14 2025

Yes!

0
User Avatar
Omokheshi
Monday, Jul 14 2025

Hey! So with any section drill or question it'll always ask you if you want to blind review. From there your blind review settings would either be that it circles questions you got wrong, spent a long time on or flagged, if you have that off it just lets you retake what you just did untimed.

0
User Avatar
Omokheshi
Sunday, Jun 22 2025

@tristan.yukon I think its because the sentence is directly related in the first example but not in the second. I would relate it to this new more simple context.

  1. Mary: I like chocolate because it is rich and milky.

  2. Steve: Mary likes chocolate because it is rich snd milky. But I think that chocolate is disgusting because it can be bitter and chalky

Though this is more simple I think that it can kind of explain that Mary bringing up reasons of why chocolate is good is her premise but Steve uses it as context for why he is even talking about chocolate in the first place

4
User Avatar
Omokheshi
Sunday, Jun 22 2025

If you're still looking for a reply I would rearrange the paragraph and add a little more to fit it in this context. To table set, the context is that "I forgot to call my sister this morning" the conclusion will probably have to be one that doesn't make sense without this context so the new paragraph will be.

I forgot to call my sister this morning. I am going into work, and my shift is 8 hours long, so sister will have to wait.

Now that the conclusion is that "my sister will have it wait" it requires the context of the first sentence to know what she is waiting for.

5

Confirm action

Are you sure?