User Avatar
OvidiuLungu
Joined
Nov 2025
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 170
CAS GPA
3.85
1L START YEAR
2027

Discussions

User Avatar
OvidiuLungu
Wednesday, May 27

@SaniqueRowe and when doing drills answer after each question, the explanations show that of the first question and not the correct one

1
User Avatar
OvidiuLungu
Tuesday, May 26

@k13lawwwwww no

1
User Avatar
OvidiuLungu
Wednesday, May 20

C is correct because some = double sided arrow. if the some statement is after the all = no valid inference.

1
User Avatar
OvidiuLungu
Wednesday, May 20

if you can create a custom drill and post it here in the comments so that we can practice what we just learned, that would be great!!!!

4
User Avatar

Edited Saturday, Mar 14

OvidiuLungu

😖 Frustrated

glitch

When clicking discussion or next in the CC it brings up the question again instead of the discussion or going to the next page.

5
User Avatar
OvidiuLungu
Friday, Jan 30

Lsac only converts A+ to 4.33. if no A+ on transcript your A will remain a 4.00. on the explaining to law schools, i honestly have no idea, usually law schools understand this but at the end of the day they care about their median so try your hardest for your highest lsat score possible.

1
User Avatar
OvidiuLungu
Friday, Jan 16

He explained this as the experiment rule but this is simply a hypothesis. The way to strengthen it is if we remove the causal factor and the event doesnt happen. (remove heavy metals… that means that they dont have resistance to anything). This is what B does. Its not about the experiment but more about how we weaken and strengthen the hypothesis and its simply by doing the three causal rules. B says that if we remove heavy metals… bacteria is not resistant to anything. Meaning that if we have heavy metals, the bacteria does have resistance which strengthens the hypothesis/conclusion. a causes b. if A is gone and b doesnt happen that means a causes b.

1
User Avatar
OvidiuLungu
Edited Sunday, Dec 7, 2025

okay i understand when the sentance uses the indicator "or" but what if the embedded sentences dont use "or" how are we supposed to simplify the embedded conditional. and the example he gives, to me is more of a normal conditional with a disjunction in the necessary position. why do we consider this an embedded conditional?

1
User Avatar
OvidiuLungu
Thursday, Nov 20, 2025

hey i am also taking it in june

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?