I like think things simplistic as possible.

1. Disney Vacation Club:

   Has multiple premises (Support)

   It supports directly to the conclusion.

   : Walt is a member of the Disney Vacation Club & has a Genie+ Pass. There is only two ways to obtain the Genie+ Pass (For Disney Vacation Club Members).

   Walt has never prostrated himself to anyone or anything before. Due to this fact, It directs to the Conclusion: Walt must have offered the requisite propitiations to Mickey.

   (Has strong evidence and support for the conclusion.)

2. Tigers

   It directly gives support to the Conclusion itself.

   But compared to the Disney Club Vacation, it only has one support for the conclusion.

3. Trash Bin

   It seems like it has multiple premises that supports the conclusion well. But, it's all assumptions.

Imagining in a world 'If' I was a judge. While looking through evidence. When I read the Disney Vacation Club it seems to add up perfectly for the conclusion. For Tigers I would have thought that's pretty much supporting. While reading the Trash Bin I would personally think the evidence is weak due to the fact every premise is an assumption.

Evidence wise, it would be

Disney> Tigers> Trash Bin

Hi everyone, My name is Rosary. My major is English Literature and Minor was International Law. Aiming for LSAT on June 2026. I would love to have a study buddy that will boost our LSAT scores together.

Aiming for June 2026! Hope for the best!