My biggest confusion was with question one.

Rule : None of the pandas that relocated to this part of the forest will prosper.

Exception: Unless we drive out the poachers"

Normally, I would interpret this to meaning that driving out the poachers would mean that the pandas will prosper. But, somehow, this assumption is wrong. I am confused why this is wrong, and would appreciate any clarity on this would be appreciated

"Avoid making assumptions in the LSAT". Then proceeds to make an assumption. The word artists were never mentioned in the passage, thus, the only way that AC: D would be wrong is if we make an assumption that "not just subsequent developments in the arts" refers to artists.

It's also quite sad because the organizers of the LSAT would never be able to admit to being wrong. For doing so would open up a black hole of "what else could they have been wrong on" in the system. Kudos!