User Avatar
SequoiaSmith
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

User Avatar
SequoiaSmith
Friday, Mar 7, 2025

What’s POE?

0
PrepTests ·
PT106.S3.Q14
User Avatar
SequoiaSmith
Tuesday, Jun 25, 2024

Hi! Can someone please explain why the "an act of omission..." clause isn't the main conclusion?

1
User Avatar
SequoiaSmith
Sunday, Jun 23, 2024

Hello,

I'm having trouble with #3 - why isn't sale negated? Unless an indicator word in group 3 (negate the sufficient) so why don't we negate it?

2
User Avatar
SequoiaSmith
Saturday, Jun 22, 2024

#help I'm a bit confused on when to use the chaining conditional method/ the lawgic method. Can anyone specify? Initially, I got 12 incorrect because of my confusion.

0
User Avatar
SequoiaSmith
Saturday, Jun 22, 2024

Hi! Why would we use the group 3 translation instead of group 4 since cannot falls under group 4?

0
User Avatar
SequoiaSmith
Thursday, Jun 20, 2024

I think because it doesn't say that either of them must die it just says they both can't be killed.

0
User Avatar
SequoiaSmith
Wednesday, Jun 19, 2024

Hello! Does anyone understand why in 8.2 the sentence was flipped?

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?