- Joined
- Sep 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
Hello all,
Basically, I had a position post-graduation that I was in for a few months, then put in my two week notice. I was unemployed for three months, then started a job that I've been in for nearly two years.
I'm just wondering if I should write an addendum? Some folks are telling me that the gap is too small and that my two years of interesting work experience since will outweigh any concerns, and that I should only write one if the school explicitly asks; others are saying that I should explain regardless of whether or not the schools asks.
Thoughts?
I believe in the prompt they strongly recommend that you cover Why Berkeley in the ps. It's usually not too difficult to integrate this, especially if your ps is one that is gearing up towards 'why law,' which Berkeley also recommends.
They technically have an additional 'Why Berkeley' optional, but it's focused more on the location and the environment rather than the academic elements.
Michigan gives me the impression that they really do want to know why you want to come to their school, so I would probably do so. I do think that if you're on the border of Admit/Waitlist, a good why x that makes the school think you have a high chance of going there will push you closer to that A.
In my opinion, I would not do that. If you're mentioning areas of law you're interested in, it should be a natural progression from whatever narrative is expressed in your personal statement, and it would seem odd if you said, "well, I'm not sure." AOs know that a lot of people will likely not go into the kinds of law they claim to be interested in. That's expected.
I feel like I don't quite know how to write this essay.
I'm not an AO or anything, but I would not mention the tiktok at all. I don't feel like it really adds anything to your argument that you couldn't introduce in a much better way.
Hello,
Two brief questions on the resume:
-I've often heard that you should list every job you've had since you started college. Is this true?
-In that case, my resume hits one page with just my jobs, and that's with some having one or two bullet points. I made sure the second page wasn't just fluff: it's mainly leadership positions and volunteer work that I think ties into my narrative. Is it okay to have two pages, even though I've only been out of college for a little over two years? I'm just a super involved person, lol
Hello,
I'm reaching the endgame of essay writing, and I just realized: how are we formatting them? I have them double spaced, times new roman, etc. Specifically, are we doing a blank line between paragraphs and no idents, or no extra line between paragraphs and idents?
Also, if one of my essays is 11 point font and another is 12 point font, is that fine as long as it's above the school's minimum font size?
@JacobBaska Yes, exactly. I always use it as more of a map, but the map is not the territory, so to speak. I just have to shake my head when anonymous redditors start acting like they know what's going on in an Admissions Office.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m happy to receive fee waivers, but schools have been deadnaming and misgendering me like crazy. Some will even use my preferred name but still misgender me, which I find a bit funny.
I get that it’s likely automated systems screwing things up, but geez.
I'm not an AO, so take my opinion with a grain of salt, but I doubt that there's a crazy difference between submitting your application now or submitting it by the end of september. I think you'd be better off waiting until you have your new score and spending the extra time going over your materials.
You see this a lot on LSA: a random Reddit account that makes some point with way too much confidence. LSA is full of randos who have read so many blog posts and gazed at LSD for so many hours, they imagine that they themselves are practically Admissions Officers.
I’m just so tired of trying to get some balanced opinion or advice and having to deal with some reddit throwaway that thinks the random opinions they’ve rationalized are the real and true thoughts of an HYS AO.
I also have an inkling that some of the people on the subreddit who will say ‘I’m an AO’ are not, in fact, AOs.
At least here I can get some good advice from Jacob.
TL;DR stay of the subreddit
Sure! For reference, I work in higher ed, so I review student essays all the time.
Hey all,
As I finish up my essays for this cycle, my current focus is on the 'why x' essay, probably one of the most important supplementals. I'm wondering what y'all believe makes for a good why x. I know it's a bad idea to just regurgitate the website, and I was planning on doing a 'here are my values/goals, here's resources/clinics/etc you have that match those, here's what I'll do with them."
Thoughts?
I'm not an expert, but I would suggest having the rest of your app ready beforehand. That way, you can fire everything off the day of score release.
It seems kind of random looking in from the outside. Sometimes folks with above median stats get nothing, while a splitter gets half tuition.
I think it's a bit hard to say because we have no way of knowing whether or not the folks admitted ED would have been admitted regardless. Like, even with ED, they're not going to admit a candidate who doesn't catch their eye, and it's not as though they don't have plenty of strong candidates in RD, you know.
Now, I imagine there could be. ED gives a school confirmation that you will attend, so they don't need to worry as much about their yield, especially if you have some quality that might be deemed competitive. I think the biggest beneficiaries of a possible ED boost would be people above both medians and splitters.
Typically they're narrative, focusing on one or two formative experiences and connecting them to your desire to pursue law school.
My best advice is to write a straightforward, reflective story that talks about what inspired you to go to law school. And whatever you do, don't turn it into this verbose, ornate mess. I remember last year Yale sent out example PS to some folks, and the LSA subreddit bashed them because they felt the writing was mediocre. I read through them again a few weeks ago and found that they were quite solid; the real problem is that many people confuse style with substance.
Would anyone like to start a group where we read each other’s essays? Obviously it’s not going to be as good as a consultant, but at least we can catch simple mistakes and make sure the right ideas are coming across.
I think Dean Andy, an administrator at Georgetown, put it best: your lsat and gpa set the bar, and your sifts determine if you clear it. What you need to understand is that top schools have many people with stats that could help them lock in their medians. What will differentiate them is factors such as essays, WE, and other softs. I think when people dismiss softs, they’re being overly cynical.
I don’t necessarily think there is such a thing as a universally strong soft. The tier list we use was actually created by a Redditor. A strong soft likely depends mostly on how it contributes to the overall cohesiveness of your application. If you want to go to law school for immigration law, for instance, working for a non-profit that helps connect immigrants to legal services will likely be a strong soft.
@bawstonlaw hey man, t14 medians are high as the clouds. I know my gpa is absolutely on the higher end, but it’s a different ballgame than it was even a few years ago.
I’m a splitter (3.82, 175, urm) aiming for t14. The consulting id rather expensive, and I wanted to source some reviews before I took the plunge.
@zunair to clear things up, I went to a school that pumps people into the t14, and having read many of their essays, you’re vastly overestimating their writing ability.
Most of what we see on the various admissions blogs are essays considered some of the best, the really impactful ones that might genuinely have moved the needle a crazy amount for the author.
But is anyone else interested in what the average law school essay looks like, especially for the elite schools? I think the examples we’re given create this false impression that most applicants are crafting these beautiful, breathtaking statements, but that’s obviously not the reality. I’m just curious what an average essay at a T14/T20 looks like.
I believe this is something that's actually recommended, as it shows that you're engaging with the school beyond simply reading the website. Just make sure it doesn't feel like you tacked it on!