Why isn't A a good answer? Just because voters are committed to a candidate, doesn't mean they will actually go out and vote. They might decide they have better things to do. But if the debate excites them, it could push them to vote, thereby increasing their candidate's chance to win!

For anyone else interested in which RC was experimental for Sabbath Testers: RC1 was experimental. RC2 with bodybuilding (and substantially easier section in general) was real! Rejoice!

My woman's suffrage article section also had one on a German evolution philosophy about lower and higher life forms all sharing similar traits. Though some scientists disproved it, it added some meaningful info...

Also an article on a female lacquer artist who had Asian influences in her art when she worked in Paris under a famous French artist. And she differed from the Art Noveau style.

I took the Dec. Sabbath LSAT for DEC. and I had woman's suffrage (how it related to African Americans) in one RC section, and bodybuilding comparative to start the second RC. Which was real? (Sounds like I got the african american passage you got as an experimental as my real one?) I also had a passage on real money vs. contract obligations and the different scenarios where each should be used.

Man, I was stuck on this question for a while. Initially I pictured it as one can (M) from one can (L). Made no sense. Then I realized it was a "GROUP" of cans made from another "GROUP" of cans. The fact the ALL of L only became 50% of M (and there are no other non-aluminum materials in L that dropped out) shows that there are MORE cans in the M pile than the L pile; twice as many, to be exact. Otherwise all of M could've been made from ALL of L.

Sigh... I just had to write this out here, to drill it in deeper into my head. Thanks for the outlet!