I am getting confused about the "guarantee" concept. In the earlier lessons, I believe it was stated that "the sufficient concept is strong enough to guarantee the conclusion and the necessary concept, if not true, the argument falls apart". It was also said that sufficiency = subsets and necessity = supersets. How does that work within this lesson? Maybe I need to start this entire conditional logic section over, but when I start to think I understand it, the new comparisons and words trip me up.
0
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
I am getting confused about the "guarantee" concept. In the earlier lessons, I believe it was stated that "the sufficient concept is strong enough to guarantee the conclusion and the necessary concept, if not true, the argument falls apart". It was also said that sufficiency = subsets and necessity = supersets. How does that work within this lesson? Maybe I need to start this entire conditional logic section over, but when I start to think I understand it, the new comparisons and words trip me up.