- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
I chose B because the prevailing view used the words "in general", leading me to believe there was room in that view for other ways to achieve evolutionary success. Can someone explain why this thinking is wrong>
## help
Under Drawing an Inference's first example, isn't this committing a sufficiency vs. necessity flaw? Should it be
Rule: If A, then B.
Inference: A is true
Fact: B is true
Can someone explain why the conditional chain went e -> (people <-s-> limit etc.), rather than e --> people limit? In other words, why are people and limit separated in the Lawgic, and not grouped together as one?
Hi Everyone!
I am currently going through the comprehensive study plan and have been watching both the videos and reading the written lessons for each lesson. Is it worth doing both? Or, am I missing something if I only read the description and don't watch the lesson as well?
#help Can someone direct me to a specific lesson that teaches this? Is it because of Most Before All - Formal Argument #5