Self-study
Hi all,
Looking for study buddies in bay area. Preferrably near Berkeley.
Aiming for 170+ on November 2024 LSAT :)
abramyansemail505
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Discussions
abramyansemail505
Monday, Aug 19 2024
Interested; can you relink the groupme? Link says expired or group not available
abramyansemail505
Thursday, Aug 15 2024
The author uses many words to sway us away from "implicit acceptance" and more towards "hesistant agreement". For example, the images were PROBABLY intended or the paintings were MEANT to grant magical power or perhaps show... etc.
Q12:
Answer choice D, still lost on how it's wrong. I see how B is valid, but I feel like thats more of an inference vs D can be found back in the text.
"Therefore, the best way to address concerns about judicial impartiality is to require judges to make their reasoning transparent."
So, wouldn't providing written explanations for legal reasoning imply that judges are making reasoning transparent, and then all goes back to addressing public's concern about impartiality?
Not sure if I am explaining this correctly but #help