I really like the images versus the "silent videos". I am having a lot of difficulties now with videos not loading at all. Please consider going back to images.

When it was a paper exam, they used the answer sheet in option

But as you probably already know, everything is done on the tablet now. Completely different set up.

You will not be denied. I personally know someone who scored in the 160's the first time and still got accommodations for their 2nd take.

Knowing what game board to use comes naturally after you've done a ton of games. There will come a point in your studies that after reading the scenario and rules, deciding what game board to use will become instinctual.

PT02 S3 G2

PT04 S3 G3

PT07 S2 G2

PT07 S2 G4

PT13 S1 G3

PT19 S1 G2

PT20 S3 G4

PT21 S1 G3

PT21 S1 G4

PT24 S4 G3

PT26 S1 G1

PT28 S2 G3

PT30 S1 G3

PT31 S1 G1

PT32 S3 G1

PT32 S3 G4

PT36 S4 G2

PT36 S4 G4

PT37 S3 G2

PT38 S2 G2

PT41 S2 G2

PT44 S3 G3

PT44 S3 G4

PT45 S3 G2

PT46 S4 G2

PT46 S4 G3

PT50 S3 G3

PT51 S4 G3

PT52 S2 G3

PT53 S2 G3

PT53 S2 G4

PT55 S4 G1

PT55 S4 G4

PT56 S1 G4

PT58 S3 G3

PT60 S2 G1

PT66 S3 G1

PT66 S3 G4

PT69 S2 G3

PT70 S3 G4

PT74 S2 G2

PT76 S3 G3

PT81 S4 G1

PT82 S2 G1

PT82 S2 G3

PT84 S4 G2

PT85 S4 G4

PT86 S2 G1

Logical Indicator Chart

Just to add to Tim's response..

You are correct, in that H does NEED to be placed in-between K & G but I believe the mistake you're making is that you're taking this rule to also mean that H can ONLY show up in-between K & G, which isn't the case.

You can be required to do something if a sufficient condition is met but that doesn't mean that absent the sufficient condition, the required action can't be performed.

e.g. You need to go to the grocery store if your friends are coming for dinner.

You can still go to the grocery store even of your friends decide to go elsewhere.

@ said:

No the LSAT contrapositive is if not b then not a

Right that's what I am saying.. the contrapositive of A ==> B is /B ==>/A. In your first post that I quoted, you wrote "If A then B; But if not b then that does not necessarily mean not A", which is false. Not sure where I'm losing you..

@ said:

You mean like making a diagram for an LR? Yes, some people do this. My friend who scored a 179, tutored me a couple of times and drilled into my head If A then B; But if not b then that does not necessarily mean not A. The power score LR bible discusses diagramming conditional logic. She said on the day she took the test, my friend, that she did a couple of small diagrams in the LR section and underlined every conclusion. Hope this helps

The contrapositive of "if A then B" is "if /B then /A". It does necessarily mean not A.