I find that it is best to write out the comparisons or arguments. For these notes I asked “why no zappers” “why birds and sprays”. Only question D addressed both questions while the rest only addressed one of the questions. Could be a good technique moving forward.
This would be a poor argument. This is also where assumptions can be made. NEVER use outside knowledge on the LSAT.
5
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
I find that it is best to write out the comparisons or arguments. For these notes I asked “why no zappers” “why birds and sprays”. Only question D addressed both questions while the rest only addressed one of the questions. Could be a good technique moving forward.