Thank you for this explanation Jenn.

What threw me off here was the word "history"-- made me think long-term history as opposed to baseline when the scientific experiment began (or the "starting point" of acne).

Same confusion that led me to wrong AC

I also got tricked by B originally, but even past the explanation-- it still wouldn't explain how the specific injuries that the seats were proven to prevent would occur- at least not as much as E.

Can J.Y explain this

I don't like how J.Y. writes off "new interpretation of the constitution" via explaining that the passage says War Powers Resolution does not alter the constitution. Yes that's right, but "new interpretation" is not at all synonymous with "altering". Supreme Court Justices have varying interpretations, because an interpretation has to do only with how you interpret what already there--- It has nothing to do with changing the subject matter.

What confused me here is that for E to work, we would have had to assumed that Jenkins was even aware of health risks.

^I rationed this the same way.

I took (E) out not for the reasons mentioned, but because I took it we had to presume that the group members even knew what their answers were going to be used for in the first place. That is-- that they even knew their responses would be used to decide monetary rewards.

Without assuming they knew of the survey's purpose, the answer choice wouldn't have worked. A and B did not require some assumption of higher knowledge-- the executives/legislators both could directly see their incentive.

In NYC and down for both as well, reach out I'm ready

Interested, DM me and I'll be ready.

Here, the use of "many" threw me off, along with the use of "almost everybody". Many is ambiguous, and almost everybody is not the same as everybody.

I ruled out B because the analogy never explicitly mentions that monetary union was implemented among these "regions", rather just that the stability and non-uniformity in living standards co-exist-- that wasn't an assumption I was willing to make. This was to me more of a give-away than the "region" vs "nation" detail.

Having the same thought, can someone please explain?

This helped.