- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
Sorry if there is another post on here that talks about this.
I just finished the CC, I'm sitting for July (less than 4 weeks away) and am wondering what PT to start with since I have limited time to PT.
I have done a decent job foolproofing, spent a ton of time on LR, and ended with RC so that is fresh on my mind and was doing surprisingly well.
I have a one week vacation from work I plan to take which I'll get about 60 (5 PTs) hours of total study time that week for PT'ing, but weeks with work I'm limited to max out at 25 hours (2 PTs) per week. Giving me a grand total of about 110 hours (not including the rest of this week).
PT's take about 12 hours in total, that's just shy of 10 PTs. Do I start with the most recent 10 then?
Ty in advance.
#help I'm sure JY explained this, and I think I know internally but can't separate them completely, what is the difference between main point, and primary purpose questions?
Yes, but after reading some posts throughout the SA curriculum, I hesitate to not use lawgic and it's formulas.
As one poster said, there shouldn't be any variation between your intuition and lawgic, because lawgic is always right. So I'm trying my best to stay the course, and really take my time with these. I've done timed conditions for all problem sets and question types up until this point, but I realize I need help with these and translating back and forth, thus I'm not worrying about speed at this point.
Yea it'd be cool if we could download or print without having to sign up with scribd..
Anyone else find that you're talking to yourself like JY does as you analyze and work through problems? I swear this has helped me tremendously. It's also pretty funny that he's almost offended at some of the answer choices given in this problem (and others), but this has helped me to look at the answers as objectively, analytically and logically as possible, like JY. So thank you.
Wow. That's huge. Thank you very much for that. I'll incorporate this into my studying and test taking immediately.
Thank you both. Yea that's absolutely the plan. I just took that 1999 one and am pretty pleased generally after just a few weeks of 7sage. The blind review is probably worth the money alone. I'm working on that as we speak.
I guess I was just worried if the preset lesson in the curriculum was "anchored" to the PT that 7sages curriculum says to do. But it seems the answer to that is no, and test away! Of course while thoroughly reviewing before taking another.
Thank you both again.
Hi guys,
I plan on following 7sage lesson plan all the way through. My question is can I/should I start with an earlier PT version?
For example, the first PT is from 2007(forget the number) in the 7sage lesson, but I have already bought tests going back to 1999 and plan on taking them all. I know you should work forward only with PTs and am thus wondering if I can start with 1999 and coincide it with the 7sage lesson. Starting from 2007 PTs may not be enough testing for the score I want and from where I'm at is my reasoning for this.
Sorry if that doesnt make sense.
Thanks,
11 months later.. hopefully you found how to not make this mistake again because I chose the same answer choices initially as you (just swapped in time and review) and totally understand why E is correct. All he did was circle it in the video, and I read it and knew and understood. Pretty sure it's going to be through repeitions that we get better but if you did find out any trick let us know!