- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I have a question on interpreting this point:
At least two compositions are performed either after F and before R, or after R and before F.
I think normally the LSAT is going for F-X-X-R or R-X-X-F (with min 2-X) but being extra cautious in doing this problem I also included a possibility of X-X-R-F-X-X and X-X-F-R-X-X since it doesn't indicate the two compositions must be the same nor must they be between them. Is this incorrect to interpret it this way? Is it safe to assume it will ways be referring to just the first set ups? (F-X-X-R)
How can we assume that answer choice B assumes an ice age period? I agree that: given we are in an ice age the concentration of oxygen 18 is increased but I switched my answer because that explicitness is not present and we know only in an ice age period it is increased otherwise it is in statis from the precipitation. I am thrown off here because the other answer choices make the distinction and this one doesn't.
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question"
I think B will be true only if you have group A at 51(%) people and group B at 75 people. Meaning to get to most (in our conclusion), all group A need to believe in group B as well. The moment you hit 52 people you now need only 51 of those people to achieve most - with 1 non believer. We can't say 50 because that rejects the almost all premise. So so long as "almost all" means > 51 you can have slack with who are the of people of those who are in group A and also believe group B, which means they don't necessarily have to be the same "exact" ones.