I wanted to double-check my reasoning. Is the answer choice B incorrect because it partially explains only a subset of the facts ? Yes, they do talk about bug zappers being less effective, but there is no mention of insect-eating birds or insect sprays and how they are more effective.
I am having a hard time understanding #3. I thought to negate the sentence it would read:
/drink beer -> /hamburger
3
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
I wanted to double-check my reasoning. Is the answer choice B incorrect because it partially explains only a subset of the facts ? Yes, they do talk about bug zappers being less effective, but there is no mention of insect-eating birds or insect sprays and how they are more effective.