Jesus, I missed the fact that it said least supported/compatible under timed and BR... gyyaahhh.

I had this one right but AC:C during BR seemed more weakening as I forgot we were not looking for that one... focus man. :(

B seemed off to me and D I really had no idea what it was saying, so I chose D.

Photosynthesis is intensified with CO2.

Burning fossil fuels intensify CO2.

Burning fossil fuels are purely great!

Nothing in life is purely great lol and definitely not in regards to burning fossil fuel.

A – cookie cutter wrong AC – contains a comparative when the stimulus does not.

B – Only chose this because the others were bad. The harm of exercise and burning fossil fuels didn’t seem comparable to me ugh but nevertheless, it says only good comes from exercise, which is not true. People get severely injured from exercise all the time.

C – It hints at how fasting could be beneficial, but doesn’t state that fasting is beneficial all the time.

– This is the cookie-cutter wrong AC that’s totally irrelevant.

D – cookie cutter wrong AC – contains a comparative. In addition, when you compare two things (A and B) and you say that B is horrible. That’s not saying that A is amazing. It’s just saying A is better than B. We’re looking for an AC that says that A is always the best.

E – Too much penicillin is bad. So make a policy where we avoid using penicillin. Mm.. If it said “not using penicillin is always good,” it may have worked, but the “best policy” idea makes it descriptively inaccurate..

I completely missed the the idea that "The theories produce the right results" were the same theories as the successful ones. I read it as "The theories THAT produce the right results" leading me to think they were a different set of theories.

A few reasons I missed this one, IMO at least. 1. I have never come across a phrase that limits the scope on an argument to the part of a problem so although it made obvious sense to me that the phrase was doing that, it seemed like a junk answer. To me it was just setting up the conclusion much like a premise would so I went with AC:D. 2. AC:D I thought meant expressing the conclusion, not WAS/IS the conclusion. Ehh, these AP questions are different, but I enjoy dissecting these arguments.

I could've sworn that AC:B meant that rodents were the only ones affected and I was like uhhh the only semi good one left is A since there would be an influx of red squirrels meaning it'd be something they overlooked lol. Did 4/5 of these in good targeted time!

I had AC : C but then during BR I was like it was never stated anything about the suceptability and I went with AC:D during BR because Most and widespread seemed synonymous to me... absolute phrases will be the death of me.

I had this one right during timed and I changed during BR. smh smh smh.

I didn't even get this on the deep level JY did but I just saw the word likely in the stimulus and the word frequency in the AC C and I was sold.

oh fuck this question.

C just seemed way too easy for me and I went with B during BR lmaooo

Note to self, the scientific community does not = all scientists.

I did not by any means associate chief influence as a level of influence. Jesus

Dammit I had this right and during BR I completely misread the q stem.

I completely misunderstood the conclusion, I thought that the critics were like "told you so, it was more expensive but whatever we got rid of it." type thing. E is so obviously the answer... I'm fried, I did like 10 of these today

I understood what they were trying to do but they language is so awful

Dude fuck this AC: C. I had this right first time around but during BR I was like tf is C even trying to say?

Chose AC:D under the time and did not even like it because of the effin word within. During BR I realized the difference between within and after lol.

I was between A and E. I didn't pick up that E implied that the economic help came after the mentioned timeline so I went with A. My reasoning for A was okay maybe there was a boom with England and Scotland, but not particularly in Glasgow?? lol.

Not sure if I am doing January or Feb LSAT just yet, but if you get a group going count me in!

Tricky question, I for some reason was in Flawed Argument mode and was like "Part to Whole / Whole to Part" flaw and forgot about the NA mission loool.

Jesus man. Misread the Q stem

I thought AC:C was just reiterating that the bonding agreement would come in form of a permit and at a price (the one alluded to in the stimulus. So, I chose AC:A it just didn't seem like it was supporting the argument.

God, I am dropping the ball on these because I do not have my Logical Indicators memorized. Anyone know a good method for memorization outside of Quizlet? lol.