Word on the street is that LSAC is making some changes. The move to electronic exams has been in the works but I hadn’t heard the LSAT was thinking of expanding to 10 exams. I’m curious, what do you guys think of the change?
Haha I am sure it was a riveting google search lolol.
You got this SamTyler. I did much better on my retake, I am sure with that attitude you will too!
I had the word schlep which isn't technically even a curse or slang word (it's just Yiddish) but was told to take it out. Better safe I think.
I guess I am a little confused as to what you mean. I think the LSAT principle of correlation not causation applies here; I am not sure I would complicate it by establishing levels of correlation. There seems to be a correlation with the pledge and lack of drinking (not causation). Is your point that the correlation is so weak we should call it something else? If that helps go for it! But I think it might confuse me personally.
So first, I love skipping. I think it is an immensely helpful too when taking timed tests. Even so, don't give up on finishing the section quite yet! With practice comes speed and you may be able to go back to some skipped questions!
As per what question type I skip, parallel and parallel flaw where immediate contenders for me. They take too long and frankly they were my worst question type. I know I am not alone in saving these for the end. Other LR skip questions include questions where I think two answer choices are strong. By skipping and coming back (after lightly guessing), sometimes I can approach the question in a new frame of mind which provides clarity.
For RC, any question that sucks me in time wise is a skip. I try to have an internal alarm that goes off telling me to move on. No question stem is an automatic skip but I often know if it is a skip contender 30 seconds into the question.
For LG, the only question I really skip on principle is rule substitution. I generally spend 45 seconds on it up front to see if an answer jumps out at me. I like to give it a first look before skipping as the rules of the game are already in my head. If none of the answer choices seem appealing I move on. Besides that, I skip according to my internal clock.
Awesome so proud!!
Really suggest people do this it is a great way to learn!!
I am currently applying for Law School and notice some schools have slightly different requirements. Harvard allows for two pages resumes- Yale doesn't. Columbia and Duke want specific things in your Personal Statement, others don't. Chicago wants hours worked on your resume, Penn makes no such requirement. Obviously you should do what they say, but how drastically are you guys noticing your materials change from school to school? Should I alter slightly for each school or change drastically? Just interested in opinions.
I think this cycle will be front-loaded with re-applicants. My guess is that applicants will be up for the first half of the cycle but turn down as we move into January. I think Spivey said this will be a flat cycle and I think I probably agree.
Haha I am now scared and excited. Hope your 1L year is going well!
@ said:
@ said:
:joy:
@ what's a mapping logic game?
yes! what's a mapping logic game? @
So Mapping is generally a sub-sect of linear or grouping games that adds the element of space. The Virus game from 2016 is kinda an example of linear mapping. June 1995 Game 2 is like a prime example of a mapping game. I am not sure 7Sage uses the "mapping terminology" but I didn't know how else to describe it. Mapping games utilize space as part of the game. In all reality there will not be a mapping game. I didn't mean to cause a stir, I was just trying to find a hot take lol.
(There have only been like 5 mapping games ever and only one since 1997.)
Here are my predictions:
curve: -12
number of flaw questions on both LR: 7
number of mss questions on both LR: 4
number of sequencing games: 2
number of grouping games: 1
number of total LSAT questions: 101
Hot take: Mapping logic game.
I have a day now to digest my July LSAT score and really reflect on my LSAT experience. First I want to say thank you to 7Sage and the community as a whole. Bluntly put, there was no way I could have been successful without this program. From JY and the CC to the discussion board and community, 7Sage has given me the confidence and the techniques to succeed. It does all of this while being more affordable than other prep programs which expands access to the legal profession. I want to give a big shout out to my Blind Review call group. If you have the opportunity, I highly suggest you join one (I believe @keets993 is leading one now). The ability to create new relationships with fellow 7Sagers was crucial as it allowed me to approach questions with new perspectives. I was able to bounce ideas off of them which allowed me to understand more about myself and how I approached the test. Big shout-out to @twssmith @BinghamtonDave @teamteamvicster @Jane1990 @Hamaseh_S @necessarynaomi @happyLSAT and everyone else on the calls. I would also like to thank @"Daniel.Sieradzki" for being a great tutor, often coming on the calls to say hello and give advice. With all of your help, I was able to go from a middling diagnostic to a 177. I could not have done it without you.
I am writing this to give thanks but also to catch the eyes of anyone considering 7Sage. This is a great community at a (more) affordable price. Please consider joining a Blind Review group and above all else do not be discouraged by your first take. I got a 169 on my first take and then improved on my second.
Lastly, I studied for this test with medically diagnosed Attention Deficit Disorder. I took no medicine and did not request accommodations. I am considering writing an informal guide for other takers that may have ADD or Dyslexia. If anyone has experienced taking the LSAT under these conditions and would like to contribute or share what worked for you, please feel free to message me.
Thank you 7Sage and all those that are here experiencing this crazy journey with me. The destination is great, but the journey was a pleasure in itself.
My best,
ChaimtheGreat
@ said:
Not sure why you think a "Cancel" in the LSAT history would look any better than just a low score. In other words, I think these two applicants would be exactly the same:
Applicant A:
Cancel
171
Applicant B:
163
171
If this becomes standard, schools are just going to (probably rightly) assume that "Cancel" meant a low score, and judge it exactly as they judge a low score now. Which is, not much, unless you have 3+ on your record, in which case eyebrows will be raised.
Now if they didnt report cancelled scores at all, that would certainly be an advantage.
It will be marginal because schools take your highest score, but applicant A will be in a slightly better position than applicant B. For B, admission reps may wonder what happened the first time. For A, they might assume you thought you got a 168 and were shooting for 170+ so you cancelled. You may have had a bad experience with a proctor so you cancelled etc...
Lol my bad I didn't see where you specifically said you were applying next cycle lol. I'm embarrassed.
I did to some extent but I would try to notate as little as possible. Through a lot of practice I was able to put a lot of the low res summaries in my head. I found personally, that too much notation slowed me down and distracted me- took away my ability to see the passage as a whole.
Relaxing. Most of the hard work is over. You should know your approach to each section by now. I would continue to drill to stay sharp. Maybe repeat a section you did well on. This week is all about maintaining confidence. Make sure your ticket is situated. I would also suggest driving to your test location to make sure you know the route and where to park. Outside of that, watch some Netflix, workout a bit, and stay confident.
I have been wondering about the snow-person myself lol.
Haha does he want to be a lawyer too?
Congratulations that's awesome!
I also suggest bubbling by page not by question. That really helped me move along.
Have you mentally been "diagnosing" RC passages as you go? One of the strategies 7Sage is big on is understanding passage structure. There are generally "types" of passages. Is it a science passage? If so, is it a biographical or phenomenon passage? Oh, this is a law passage... is it a two opinion type passage or is it comparative? Understanding passage types allowed me to understand where the passage was going before I even got there. This allowed me to read quicker and understand question faster, giving me more time at the end. I believe there were some really helpful webinars breaking down RC passage types. You can learn this skill, but it will develop on its own the more RC passages you do. Nine is not a ton.
Lastly, don't rush this. Develop the fundamentals of RC then do a passage or two. When you are mastering these passages then move to timed sections. Most of your time should be spent on timed sections, but don't be afraid to step back and really dissect a passage or two. RC was my worst section though, so I feel you 100%. Good luck!
While groups such as 7Sage and Spivey do an amazing job (really!!) I would suggest looking into free routes as well. Are you in undergrad? I know my university has an undergrad pre-law advisor who has been very helpful to me and others!
I cannot find PT C to save my life. Does anyone know where I could get my hands on it? Would like to grapple with its LG section. Any help appreciated.
Thank you 7Sage!!!
First, I want to congratulate you on taking the LSAT. This is a hard test and a long journey. Even if you are disappointed, everyone here is proud of you and the work you have done. Remember, Law Schools really only look at your highest score. You can retake the LSAT in November. Perhaps, start your November studying with a retake of a PT did you did well on. Go back to favorite games or passages to build up steam. Have you ever gotten a glowing job review while in service, schools, or employment? What about LORs? Re-read them, hear from those who know you best about why they believe in you. This occasionally helps me build confidence and get going after a setback. You go this!
As for actual test prep, I am not sure how to give advice without seeing a complete section breakdown. On a hunch, I would suggest studying up on LG. It is the easiest to grab points on and the confidence you build there should snowball into a better test performance.
If you want more detailed advice, dm me. I would be happy to take a look at any material!
@ said:
Drink beer! :D Congrats!
I mean, you spelled Tequila wrong but basically.... yeah.